PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PME.AX vs. BAB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PME.AX vs. BAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PME.AX is traded in AUD, while BAB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BAB.L values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PME.AX achieves a -24.71% return, which is significantly lower than BAB.L's -21.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PME.AX has outperformed BAB.L with an annualized return of 43.52%, while BAB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.


PME.AX

1D
0.09%
1M
28.03%
YTD
-24.71%
6M
-32.59%
1Y
-39.70%
3Y*
38.48%
5Y*
27.62%
10Y*
43.52%

BAB.L

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-21.68%
6M
-16.99%
1Y
-10.23%
3Y*
50.20%
5Y*
29.93%
10Y*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PME.AX vs. BAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PME.AX
Pro Medicus Limited
-24.71%-11.52%161.84%74.19%-11.11%83.31%53.66%106.06%25.55%83.18%
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-21.68%149.39%38.52%48.09%-15.67%19.41%-58.19%43.15%-24.55%-22.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PME.AX and BAB.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PME.AX vs. BAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PME.AX
PME.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PME.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PME.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PME.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PME.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PME.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PME.AX vs. BAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PME.AXBAB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.98

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.25

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

-0.62

-0.37

PME.AX vs. BAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PME.AX Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the BAB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PME.AX and BAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PME.AXBAB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

-0.29

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.88

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.05

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.18

+0.43

Drawdowns

PME.AX vs. BAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PME.AX drawdown since its inception was -87.37%, which is greater than BAB.L's maximum drawdown of -82.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PME.AX and BAB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PME.AXBAB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.37%

-82.11%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.24%

-40.91%

-26.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.24%

-40.91%

-26.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.24%

-40.91%

-26.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.24%

-79.06%

+11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.63%

-34.93%

-14.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.61%

-32.82%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.41%

16.36%

+23.05%

Volatility

PME.AX vs. BAB.L - Volatility Comparison

Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) at 11.77%. This indicates that PME.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PME.AXBAB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.23%

11.77%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.34%

25.51%

+22.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.59%

34.89%

+15.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.36%

33.89%

+7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.34%

37.05%

+6.29%

Dividends

PME.AX vs. BAB.L - Dividend Comparison

PME.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than BAB.L's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.67%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%
PME.AX
Pro Medicus Limited
0.37%0.25%0.16%0.31%0.40%0.24%0.35%0.31%0.55%0.46%0.62%0.60%

Financials

PME.AX vs. BAB.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pro Medicus Limited and Babcock International Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. PME.AX values in AUD, BAB.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


PME.AX and BAB.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PME.AX and BAB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer