PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLUG vs. MARA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLUG vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLUG achieves a 61.93% return, which is significantly higher than MARA's 53.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PLUG has outperformed MARA with an annualized return of 5.89%, while MARA has yielded a comparatively lower -10.80% annualized return.


PLUG

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.24%
YTD
61.93%
6M
47.69%
1Y
229.14%
3Y*
-29.67%
5Y*
-37.11%
10Y*
5.89%

MARA

1D
11.85%
1M
6.49%
YTD
53.45%
6M
14.36%
1Y
-12.67%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
-12.02%
10Y*
-10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLUG vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
61.93%-7.51%-52.67%-63.62%-56.18%-16.75%973.10%154.84%-47.46%96.67%
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
53.45%-46.45%-28.61%586.84%-89.59%214.75%1,084.48%-39.16%-91.17%-40.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PLUG and MARA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2012

0.27

The correlation between PLUG and MARA shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLUG:

$4.43B

MARA:

$5.24B

EPS

PLUG:

-$1.39

MARA:

-$4.95

PS Ratio

PLUG:

5.21

MARA:

6.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLUG:

$739.76M

MARA:

$867.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLUG:

-$189.79M

MARA:

$164.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

PLUG:

-$745.89M

MARA:

$373.68M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLUG vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLUG
PLUG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PLUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PLUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MARA
MARA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLUG vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLUGMARADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.04

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

-0.18

+4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

-0.30

+7.23

PLUG vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLUG and MARA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLUGMARADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

-0.16

+2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

-0.11

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

-0.08

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

-0.09

-0.05

Drawdowns

PLUG vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLUG drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUG and MARA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLUGMARADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-99.74%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.66%

-70.53%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.69%

-78.34%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.43%

-95.87%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.04%

-99.20%

+0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.79%

-91.09%

-8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.23%

-78.01%

-18.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.23%

42.27%

-9.04%

Volatility

PLUG vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) has a higher volatility of 30.53% compared to MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) at 22.21%. This indicates that PLUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLUGMARADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.53%

22.21%

+8.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.42%

60.03%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.05%

78.82%

+32.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.50%

106.02%

-11.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.47%

144.17%

-54.70%

Dividends

PLUG vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither PLUG nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PLUG vs. MARA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plug Power Inc. and MARA Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
163.51M
174.61M
(PLUG) Total Revenue
(MARA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLUG and MARA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLUG has higher volatility (30.53%) compared to MARA (22.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLUG dropped -99.99% vs MARA's -99.74%.

PLUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLUG and MARA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer