PLTR vs. SMR
PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 41.37%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for SMR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTR vs. SMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PLTR having a -23.22% return and SMR slightly lower at -24.06%.
PLTR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -24.81%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 108.67%
- 5Y*
- 41.37%
- 10Y*
- —
SMR
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -24.06%
- 6M
- -50.09%
- 1Y
- -68.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- —
PLTR vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -23.22% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | -11.57% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -24.06% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTR and SMR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PLTR and SMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PLTR:
$350.85B
SMR:
$3.44B
PLTR:
$0.89
SMR:
-$2.02
PLTR:
67.07
SMR:
113.60
PLTR:
41.52
SMR:
2.95
PLTR:
$5.22B
SMR:
$18.10M
PLTR:
$4.39B
SMR:
$4.45M
PLTR:
$2.01B
SMR:
-$696.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTR vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank
PLTR
SMR
PLTR vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTR | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.91 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.83 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | -1.22 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTR | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.66 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.02 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.02 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
PLTR vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, roughly equal to the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and SMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTR | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -87.47% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.19% | -82.86% | +44.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -82.86% | +42.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.14% | -87.47% | +8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.13% | -79.86% | +45.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.29% | -34.97% | -5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.71% | 56.46% | -35.75% |
Volatility
PLTR vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) is 17.24%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 29.21%. This indicates that PLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTR | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.24% | 29.21% | -11.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.35% | 69.12% | -30.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.93% | 104.37% | -53.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.44% | 93.41% | -27.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.81% | 89.34% | -19.53% |
Dividends
PLTR vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PLTR nor SMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PLTR vs. SMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palantir Technologies Inc. and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTR and SMR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (29.21%) compared to PLTR (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs SMR's -87.47%.
PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTR and SMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer