PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTR vs. NVDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTR vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than NVDX's 10.05% return.


PLTR

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-24.81%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
108.67%
5Y*
41.37%
10Y*

NVDX

1D
3.29%
1M
-8.23%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.02%
1Y
63.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTR vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-23.22%135.03%340.48%-0.17%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
10.05%26.24%384.03%28.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTR and NVDX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTR vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTR vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTRNVDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.19

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

1.46

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

3.29

-2.96

PLTR vs. NVDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the NVDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTR and NVDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTRNVDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

0.92

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.37

-0.51

Drawdowns

PLTR vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than NVDX's maximum drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and NVDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTRNVDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-68.19%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.19%

-43.76%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.13%

-23.35%

-10.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.29%

-20.28%

-20.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.71%

19.42%

+1.29%

Volatility

PLTR vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) is 17.24%, while T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a volatility of 26.28%. This indicates that PLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTRNVDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.24%

26.28%

-9.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.35%

52.61%

-14.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.93%

69.59%

-18.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.44%

95.73%

-30.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.81%

95.73%

-25.92%

Dividends

PLTR vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison

PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.


PositionTTM20252024
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
3.04%3.35%15.48%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTR and NVDX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDX has higher volatility (26.28%) compared to PLTR (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs NVDX's -68.19%.

NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTR and NVDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer