PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PLTR vs. EEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PLTR vs. EEM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 41.37%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for EEM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PLTR vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 20.18% return.

PLTR

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-24.81%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
108.67%
5Y*
41.37%
10Y*
—

EEM

1D
1.80%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
20.18%
6M
22.10%
1Y
43.51%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTR vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.		-23.22%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%147.89%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF		20.18%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%18.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTR and EEM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Palantir Technologies Inc.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Often compared with PLTR:
PLTR vs. BBAIPLTR vs. AMDPLTR vs. IONQPLTR vs. QQQPLTR vs. PLTYPLTR vs. SPYPLTR vs. NBIS
Often compared with EEM:
EEM vs. VWOEEM vs. SPYEEM vs. IEMGEEM vs. IS3N.DEEEM vs. VXUSEEM vs. EEMSEEM vs. SPEM

Return for Risk

PLTR vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTR vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PLTREEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.14
2.07

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.53
2.66

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.39

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

3.23

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

12.20

-11.87

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTR vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTR and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PLTREEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.07

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.31

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.46

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.37

+0.49

Drawdowns

PLTR vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and EEM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PLTREEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-66.43%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.19%

-13.52%

-24.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

-17.29%

-23.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

-37.49%

-41.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.82%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.13%

-7.13%

-27.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.29%

-16.01%

-24.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.71%

3.58%

+17.13%

Volatility

PLTR vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.24% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 10.60%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PLTREEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.24%

10.60%

+6.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.35%

18.87%

+19.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.93%

21.19%

+29.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.44%

19.16%

+46.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.81%

20.62%

+49.19%

Dividends

PLTR vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF		1.85%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PLTR and EEM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to EEM (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs EEM's -66.43%.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTR and EEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer