PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PLTR vs. CVD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PLTR vs. CVD.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while CVD.TO (iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Convertible Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 41.37%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for CVD.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PLTR vs. CVD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PLTR is traded in USD, while CVD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CVD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than CVD.TO's 1.49% return.

PLTR

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-24.81%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
108.67%
5Y*
41.37%
10Y*
—

CVD.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.09%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
6.76%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
3.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTR vs. CVD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.		-23.22%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%
CVD.TO
iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF		1.49%12.22%3.88%6.17%-10.31%5.38%11.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTR and CVD.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Palantir Technologies Inc.

iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF

Often compared with PLTR:
PLTR vs. BBAIPLTR vs. AMDPLTR vs. IONQPLTR vs. QQQPLTR vs. PLTYPLTR vs. SPYPLTR vs. NBIS
Often compared with CVD.TO:
CVD.TO vs. ZWC.TOCVD.TO vs. ICVTCVD.TO vs. XHY.TOCVD.TO vs. CGHY.TOCVD.TO vs. XHB.TOCVD.TO vs. XEQT.TOCVD.TO vs. XSB.TO

Return for Risk

PLTR vs. CVD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
CVD.TO
CVD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CVD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTR vs. CVD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PLTRCVD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.14
0.67

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.53
0.95

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.13

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

1.51

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

3.12

-2.78

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTR vs. CVD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the CVD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTR and CVD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PLTRCVD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

0.67

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.13

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.30

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.15

+0.71

Drawdowns

PLTR vs. CVD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than CVD.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and CVD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PLTRCVD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-34.37%

-50.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.19%

-3.78%

-34.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

-14.52%

-26.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

-22.91%

-56.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-30.24%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.13%

-3.78%

-30.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.29%

-9.34%

-30.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.71%

1.83%

+18.88%

Volatility

PLTR vs. CVD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.24% compared to iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF (CVD.TO) at 1.39%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PLTRCVD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.24%

1.39%

+15.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.35%

6.65%

+31.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.93%

8.61%

+42.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.44%

11.37%

+54.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.81%

11.79%

+58.02%

Dividends

PLTR vs. CVD.TO - Dividend Comparison

PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVD.TO
iShares Convertible Bond Index ETF		4.94%4.91%5.14%5.33%5.05%4.61%4.48%4.52%4.97%4.65%4.51%4.94%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PLTR and CVD.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTR and CVD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer