PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLD vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLD vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLD achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's -2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PLD has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 14.19%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.32% annualized return.


PLD

1D
-1.22%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
12.74%
6M
14.51%
1Y
35.80%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
14.19%

JPM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.98%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
20.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLD vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
12.74%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-2.52%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PLD and JPM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 1997

0.37

The correlation between PLD and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLD:

$136.72B

JPM:

$869.15B

EPS

PLD:

$3.88

JPM:

$21.08

PE Ratio

PLD:

36.76

JPM:

14.76

PS Ratio

PLD:

15.27

JPM:

3.05

PB Ratio

PLD:

2.56

JPM:

2.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLD:

$8.95B

JPM:

$285.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLD:

$3.88B

JPM:

$173.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLD:

$7.71B

JPM:

$81.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLD vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLD vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLDJPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

1.26

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

2.98

+9.36

PLD vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLD and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLDJPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

0.90

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.69

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.74

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.34

-0.01

Drawdowns

PLD vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLD drawdown since its inception was -84.70%, which is greater than JPM's maximum drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLD and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLDJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.70%

-76.16%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-15.47%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.37%

-24.42%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.30%

-38.77%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.30%

-43.63%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.67%

-6.55%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-17.62%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

6.50%

-3.59%

Volatility

PLD vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) is 5.54%, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that PLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLDJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

6.40%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

17.38%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.22%

21.62%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

24.45%

+2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.98%

27.40%

-0.42%

Dividends

PLD vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than JPM's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.90%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
2.87%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%

Financials

PLD vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prologis, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
2.30B
73.66B
(PLD) Total Revenue
(JPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PLD vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Prologis, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
10.1%
64.3%
Portfolio components
PLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.

JPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 47.33B and revenue of 73.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.

PLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

JPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 20.48B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

PLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.

JPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 16.49B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLD and JPM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPM has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to PLD (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLD dropped -84.70% vs JPM's -76.16%.

PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLD and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer