PLD vs. GLW
PLD (Prologis, Inc.) and GLW (Corning Incorporated) are both stocks. PLD operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while GLW operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PLD returned 14.19%/yr vs 27.99%/yr for GLW. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLD vs. GLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLD achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 114.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PLD has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 14.19%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 27.99% annualized return.
PLD
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 35.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
GLW
- 1D
- 5.61%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 114.91%
- 6M
- 113.18%
- 1Y
- 273.87%
- 3Y*
- 83.04%
- 5Y*
- 37.92%
- 10Y*
- 27.99%
PLD vs. GLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 12.74% | 25.08% | -18.12% | 21.58% | -31.33% | 72.33% | 14.74% | 55.87% | -6.25% | 25.94% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 114.91% | 87.76% | 60.64% | -1.23% | -11.56% | 5.92% | 27.57% | -1.02% | -3.28% | 34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLD and GLW is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 1997 | 0.32 |
The correlation between PLD and GLW shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PLD:
$136.72B
GLW:
$161.81B
PLD:
$3.88
GLW:
$2.10
PLD:
36.76
GLW:
89.34
PLD:
15.27
GLW:
9.91
PLD:
2.56
GLW:
13.70
PLD:
$8.95B
GLW:
$16.32B
PLD:
$3.88B
GLW:
$5.93B
PLD:
$7.71B
GLW:
$3.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLD vs. GLW — Risk / Return Rank
PLD
GLW
PLD vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLD | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.65 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 11.99 | -8.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 39.68 | -27.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLD | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 4.97 | -3.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 1.07 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.83 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.26 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
PLD vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLD drawdown since its inception was -84.70%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLD and GLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLD | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.70% | -99.02% | +14.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -23.01% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.37% | -27.57% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.30% | -34.52% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.30% | -48.80% | +5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.67% | -9.82% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -50.52% | +33.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 6.94% | -4.03% |
Volatility
PLD vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) is 5.54%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 26.26%. This indicates that PLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLD | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 26.26% | -20.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 49.84% | -35.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 55.59% | -34.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 35.57% | -8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.98% | 33.75% | -6.77% |
Dividends
PLD vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison
PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than GLW's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 0.60% | 1.28% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 2.87% | 3.16% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 2.33% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.54% |
Financials
PLD vs. GLW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prologis, Inc. and Corning Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLD vs. GLW - Profitability Comparison
PLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.
GLW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
PLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
GLW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
PLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.
GLW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLD and GLW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLW has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to PLD (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLD dropped -84.70% vs GLW's -99.02%.
GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLD and GLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer