PLD vs. AFL
PLD (Prologis, Inc.) and AFL (Aflac Incorporated) are both stocks. PLD operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while AFL operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, PLD returned 14.19%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for AFL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLD vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLD achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PLD has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 14.19%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.
PLD
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 35.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
AFL
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 13.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
PLD vs. AFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 12.74% | 25.08% | -18.12% | 21.58% | -31.33% | 72.33% | 14.74% | 55.87% | -6.25% | 25.94% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 5.61% | 8.94% | 28.08% | 17.36% | 26.41% | 34.55% | -13.60% | 18.55% | 6.20% | 29.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLD and AFL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 1997 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
PLD:
$136.72B
AFL:
$59.32B
PLD:
$3.88
AFL:
$8.76
PLD:
36.76
AFL:
13.16
PLD:
15.27
AFL:
3.35
PLD:
2.56
AFL:
2.64
PLD:
$8.95B
AFL:
$18.22B
PLD:
$3.88B
AFL:
$8.70B
PLD:
$7.71B
AFL:
$6.67B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLD vs. AFL — Risk / Return Rank
PLD
AFL
PLD vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLD | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.14 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 1.49 | +2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 3.70 | +8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLD | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 0.80 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.86 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.60 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.48 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
PLD vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLD drawdown since its inception was -84.70%, roughly equal to the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLD and AFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLD | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.70% | -82.71% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -9.11% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.37% | -13.56% | -17.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.30% | -19.86% | -23.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.30% | -54.89% | +11.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.67% | -2.54% | -4.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -11.66% | -5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.67% | -0.76% |
Volatility
PLD vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
Prologis, Inc. (PLD) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLD | AFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 5.82% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 12.24% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 17.08% | +4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 20.94% | +6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.98% | 25.77% | +1.21% |
Dividends
PLD vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
PLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than AFL's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 2.07% | 2.10% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% |
PLD Prologis, Inc. | 2.87% | 3.16% | 3.63% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 1.50% | 2.33% | 2.38% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 3.18% | 3.54% |
Financials
PLD vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prologis, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLD vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison
PLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 232.54M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.
AFL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 4.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.
PLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported an operating income of 827.03M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
AFL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
PLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prologis, Inc. reported a net income of 981.98M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.
AFL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLD and AFL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFL has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to PLD (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLD dropped -84.70% vs AFL's -82.71%.
PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLD and AFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer