PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PL vs. CMCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PL vs. CMCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 66.02% return, which is significantly higher than CMCL's -23.85% return.


PL

1D
1.61%
1M
-16.14%
YTD
66.02%
6M
152.82%
1Y
460.62%
3Y*
112.54%
5Y*
26.90%
10Y*

CMCL

1D
-1.30%
1M
-17.18%
YTD
-23.85%
6M
-17.45%
1Y
8.42%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PL vs. CMCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PL
Planet Labs PBC
66.02%388.12%63.56%-43.22%-29.27%-37.88%
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
-23.85%186.75%-18.90%2.65%11.39%-15.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PL and CMCL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2021

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PL:

$11.31B

CMCL:

$390.18M

EPS

PL:

-$1.17

CMCL:

$3.15

PS Ratio

PL:

31.13

CMCL:

1.42

PB Ratio

PL:

25.50

CMCL:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

PL:

$335.61M

CMCL:

$274.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PL:

$186.28M

CMCL:

$142.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

PL:

-$125.70M

CMCL:

$137.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PL vs. CMCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PL
PL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCL
CMCL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CMCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PL vs. CMCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLCMCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.08

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.45

0.18

+12.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.43

0.35

+38.08

PL vs. CMCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PL Sharpe Ratio is 4.57, which is higher than the CMCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL and CMCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLCMCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57

0.13

+4.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.22

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.33

0.00

Drawdowns

PL vs. CMCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.73%, which is greater than CMCL's maximum drawdown of -65.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and CMCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLCMCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.73%

-65.77%

-19.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.32%

-46.89%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.17%

-46.89%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.73%

-50.00%

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.30%

-46.89%

+10.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-35.78%

-14.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.07%

24.39%

-12.32%

Volatility

PL vs. CMCL - Volatility Comparison

Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 39.05% compared to Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) at 13.82%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLCMCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.05%

13.82%

+25.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.24%

47.23%

+30.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.84%

65.15%

+36.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.73%

52.69%

+28.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.79%

54.58%

+25.21%

Dividends

PL vs. CMCL - Dividend Comparison

PL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
2.84%2.14%5.95%4.59%4.52%4.29%2.11%3.27%5.23%1.86%
PL
Planet Labs PBC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PL vs. CMCL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Labs PBC and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00M80.00M90.00M20222023202420252026
94.15M
66.43M
(PL) Total Revenue
(CMCL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PL and CMCL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PL has higher volatility (39.05%) compared to CMCL (13.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL dropped -85.73% vs CMCL's -65.77%.

PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PL and CMCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer