PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKG vs. FITB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PKG vs. FITB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKG achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than FITB's 12.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PKG having a 15.57% annualized return and FITB not far behind at 14.81%.


PKG

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
7.03%
6M
12.85%
1Y
14.47%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
15.57%

FITB

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.33%
YTD
12.00%
6M
16.93%
1Y
36.57%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
14.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKG vs. FITB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
7.03%-6.08%41.70%31.90%-2.62%1.55%27.20%38.35%-28.85%45.51%
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
12.00%14.75%27.20%10.41%-21.94%62.46%-5.43%35.20%-20.32%15.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PKG and FITB is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2000

0.41

The correlation between PKG and FITB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PKG:

$19.55B

FITB:

$43.14B

EPS

PKG:

$8.25

FITB:

$3.06

PE Ratio

PKG:

26.58

FITB:

17.00

PS Ratio

PKG:

2.14

FITB:

2.71

PB Ratio

PKG:

4.26

FITB:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

PKG:

$9.22B

FITB:

$13.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PKG:

$1.89B

FITB:

$9.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

PKG:

$1.84B

FITB:

$3.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKG vs. FITB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKG
PKG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FITB
FITB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKG vs. FITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKGFITBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

1.73

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

4.84

-2.98

PKG vs. FITB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKG Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FITB Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKG and FITB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKGFITBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.43

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.28

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.41

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.21

+0.26

Drawdowns

PKG vs. FITB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKG drawdown since its inception was -66.88%, smaller than the maximum FITB drawdown of -98.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKG and FITB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKGFITBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.88%

-98.13%

+31.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.21%

-21.21%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.43%

-29.95%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.78%

-51.68%

+19.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.18%

-64.06%

+25.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-4.81%

-5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-31.45%

+19.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.81%

7.57%

+0.24%

Volatility

PKG vs. FITB - Volatility Comparison

Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) have volatilities of 8.19% and 8.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKGFITBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

8.36%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.03%

20.29%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.97%

25.77%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.34%

31.95%

-6.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

36.30%

-8.97%

Dividends

PKG vs. FITB - Dividend Comparison

PKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than FITB's 3.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITB
Fifth Third Bancorp
3.02%3.29%3.41%3.94%3.84%2.62%3.92%3.06%3.14%1.98%1.97%2.59%
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
2.28%2.42%2.22%3.07%3.71%2.94%2.44%2.82%3.59%2.09%2.78%3.49%

Financials

PKG vs. FITB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Packaging Corporation of America and Fifth Third Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B20222023202420252026
2.37B
3.87B
(PKG) Total Revenue
(FITB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PKG vs. FITB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Packaging Corporation of America and Fifth Third Bancorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
67.3%
Portfolio components
PKG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a gross profit of 452.90M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

FITB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

PKG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported an operating income of 272.60M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

FITB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported an operating income of 207.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

PKG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a net income of 170.90M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

FITB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fifth Third Bancorp reported a net income of 165.00M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PKG and FITB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FITB has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to PKG (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKG dropped -66.88% vs FITB's -98.13%.

FITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKG and FITB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer