PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKG vs. FAST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PKG vs. FAST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Fastenal Company (FAST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKG achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than FAST's 15.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PKG has underperformed FAST with an annualized return of 15.57%, while FAST has yielded a comparatively higher 18.29% annualized return.


PKG

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
7.03%
6M
12.85%
1Y
14.47%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
15.57%

FAST

1D
-1.69%
1M
4.14%
YTD
15.88%
6M
13.97%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
18.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKG vs. FAST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
7.03%-6.08%41.70%31.90%-2.62%1.55%27.20%38.35%-28.85%45.51%
FAST
Fastenal Company
15.88%13.98%13.53%41.31%-24.34%34.06%36.60%45.08%-1.61%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PKG and FAST is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2000

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PKG:

$19.55B

FAST:

$52.94B

EPS

PKG:

$8.25

FAST:

$1.13

PE Ratio

PKG:

26.58

FAST:

40.72

PEG Ratio

PKG:

35.03

FAST:

4.78

PS Ratio

PKG:

2.14

FAST:

6.27

PB Ratio

PKG:

4.26

FAST:

13.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

PKG:

$9.22B

FAST:

$8.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PKG:

$1.89B

FAST:

$3.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

PKG:

$1.84B

FAST:

$1.80B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKG vs. FAST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKG
PKG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FAST
FAST Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FAST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAST Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FAST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAST Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKG vs. FAST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Fastenal Company (FAST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKGFASTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.53

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

1.07

+0.79

PKG vs. FAST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKG Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the FAST Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKG and FAST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKGFASTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.47

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.69

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.53

-0.06

Drawdowns

PKG vs. FAST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKG drawdown since its inception was -66.88%, which is greater than FAST's maximum drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKG and FAST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKGFASTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.88%

-63.43%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.21%

-21.90%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.43%

-21.90%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.78%

-30.71%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.18%

-30.71%

-7.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.39%

-7.24%

-3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-12.17%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.81%

10.94%

-3.13%

Volatility

PKG vs. FAST - Volatility Comparison

Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Fastenal Company (FAST) at 6.42%. This indicates that PKG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKGFASTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

6.42%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.03%

19.37%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.97%

24.92%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.34%

24.31%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

26.78%

+0.55%

Dividends

PKG vs. FAST - Dividend Comparison

PKG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than FAST's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAST
Fastenal Company
2.00%2.18%2.17%2.75%2.62%1.75%2.87%2.35%2.95%2.34%2.55%2.74%
PKG
Packaging Corporation of America
2.28%2.42%2.22%3.07%3.71%2.94%2.44%2.82%3.59%2.09%2.78%3.49%

Financials

PKG vs. FAST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Packaging Corporation of America and Fastenal Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B20222023202420252026
2.37B
2.20B
(PKG) Total Revenue
(FAST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PKG vs. FAST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Packaging Corporation of America and Fastenal Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
19.1%
44.6%
Portfolio components
PKG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a gross profit of 452.90M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

FAST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a gross profit of 982.90M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.

PKG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported an operating income of 272.60M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

FAST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported an operating income of 447.60M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

PKG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Packaging Corporation of America reported a net income of 170.90M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

FAST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a net income of 339.80M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PKG and FAST have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKG has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to FAST (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKG dropped -66.88% vs FAST's -63.43%.

PKG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKG and FAST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer