PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGR vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PGR vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGR achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.


PGR

1D
-1.84%
1M
3.23%
YTD
-6.42%
6M
-4.51%
1Y
-23.65%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
23.25%

VRT

1D
0.02%
1M
-11.59%
YTD
85.57%
6M
61.97%
1Y
160.87%
3Y*
142.34%
5Y*
62.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGR vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
-6.42%-3.02%51.39%23.16%26.81%10.84%41.48%25.14%0.77%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
85.57%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PGR and VRT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.09

The correlation between PGR and VRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PGR:

$19.23

VRT:

$3.99

PE Ratio

PGR:

10.41

VRT:

75.41

PEG Ratio

PGR:

0.08

VRT:

0.33

PS Ratio

PGR:

1.34

VRT:

10.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

PGR:

$87.65B

VRT:

$10.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PGR:

$23.23B

VRT:

$3.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

PGR:

$14.81B

VRT:

$2.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGR vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGR
PGR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGR vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGRVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.41

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

6.53

-7.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

18.20

-19.63

PGR vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGR Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGR and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGRVRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

2.79

-3.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.03

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.00

-0.42

Drawdowns

PGR vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGR drawdown since its inception was -71.06%, roughly equal to the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGR and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGRVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.06%

-71.24%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.27%

-24.78%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-61.28%

+30.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-71.24%

+40.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.74%

-20.11%

-6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-16.22%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.79%

8.89%

+9.90%

Volatility

PGR vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is 7.57%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that PGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGRVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

16.60%

-9.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

45.55%

-28.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

58.11%

-35.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.55%

61.81%

-37.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

54.61%

-30.13%

Dividends

PGR vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
6.94%2.15%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PGR vs. VRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Progressive Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.74B
2.65B
(PGR) Total Revenue
(VRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PGR vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Progressive Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
29.3%
37.7%
Portfolio components
PGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.66B and revenue of 22.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

PGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported an operating income of 3.68B and revenue of 22.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

PGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a net income of 2.95B and revenue of 22.74B, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PGR and VRT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to PGR (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGR dropped -71.06% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGR and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer