PG vs. VWO
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock, while VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.64%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for VWO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 8.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PG having a 8.64% annualized return and VWO not far behind at 8.60%.
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
PG vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and VWO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PG and VWO has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
PG
VWO
PG vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.28 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.18 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 7.79 | -8.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 1.49 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.27 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.26 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
PG vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -67.68% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -11.17% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -17.37% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -32.60% | +8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -36.39% | +12.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.91% | -4.67% | -11.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -15.81% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 3.12% | +5.81% |
Volatility
PG vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 6.29%. This indicates that PG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 6.29% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 13.80% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 16.37% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 17.45% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 19.23% | -0.18% |
Dividends
PG vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than VWO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and VWO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to VWO (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs VWO's -67.68%.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer