PG vs. SLV
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.64%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for SLV. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 8.64%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
SLV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -15.66%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 88.38%
- 3Y*
- 40.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
PG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -4.41% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and SLV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
PG
SLV
PG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.30 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.09 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 4.40 | -5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 1.50 | -1.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.23 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
PG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -76.28% | +22.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -42.45% | +26.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -42.45% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -42.45% | +18.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -42.81% | +19.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.91% | -41.69% | +25.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -44.67% | +32.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 20.15% | -11.22% |
Volatility
PG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 7.01%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 16.89% | -9.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 58.88% | -43.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 59.53% | -40.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 36.33% | -18.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 31.92% | -12.87% |
Dividends
PG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and SLV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to PG (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs SLV's -76.28%.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer