PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PG vs. RKT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PG vs. RKT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PG is traded in USD, while RKT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RKT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than RKT.L's -26.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has outperformed RKT.L with an annualized return of 8.64%, while RKT.L has yielded a comparatively lower -2.05% annualized return.


PG

1D
-0.98%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.43%
1Y
-8.99%
3Y*
2.29%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
8.64%

RKT.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
-26.44%
6M
-24.43%
1Y
-12.72%
3Y*
-4.81%
5Y*
-5.35%
10Y*
-2.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PG vs. RKT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.74%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%
RKT.L
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
-26.44%38.93%-8.30%2.15%-16.82%-1.24%12.77%9.01%-15.91%12.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PG and RKT.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PG:

$350.63B

RKT.L:

£29.59B

EPS

PG:

$5.23

RKT.L:

£6.17

PE Ratio

PG:

27.76

RKT.L:

7.35

PEG Ratio

PG:

6.79

RKT.L:

0.15

PS Ratio

PG:

4.07

RKT.L:

1.22

PB Ratio

PG:

6.50

RKT.L:

3.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

PG:

$86.72B

RKT.L:

£24.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PG:

$43.64B

RKT.L:

£15.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

PG:

$22.63B

RKT.L:

£6.67B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PG vs. RKT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RKT.L
RKT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RKT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RKT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
RKT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RKT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RKT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PG vs. RKT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGRKT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.91

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.41

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-1.02

-0.01

PG vs. RKT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PG Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is comparable to the RKT.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PG and RKT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGRKT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

-0.57

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.22

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

-0.09

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.14

+0.32

Drawdowns

PG vs. RKT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, which is greater than RKT.L's maximum drawdown of -44.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and RKT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGRKT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.25%

-44.27%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-30.59%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-31.59%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

-39.50%

+15.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-44.27%

+20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.91%

-31.45%

+15.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-14.05%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.93%

12.40%

-3.47%

Volatility

PG vs. RKT.L - Volatility Comparison

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RKT.L) have volatilities of 7.01% and 6.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGRKT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

6.88%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

17.40%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

22.25%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

24.00%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

23.38%

-4.33%

Dividends

PG vs. RKT.L - Dividend Comparison

PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than RKT.L's 10.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.94%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
RKT.L
Reckitt Benckiser Group plc
10.15%3.30%3.90%3.31%2.91%2.64%2.56%2.71%2.69%2.24%2.05%1.98%

Financials

PG vs. RKT.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Reckitt Benckiser Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
21.24B
7.22B
(PG) Total Revenue
(RKT.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PG values in USD, RKT.L values in GBp

PG vs. RKT.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Procter & Gamble Company and Reckitt Benckiser Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
49.5%
60.6%
Portfolio components
PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

RKT.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.37B and revenue of 7.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

RKT.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported an operating income of 2.72B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.6%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

RKT.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc reported a net income of 2.22B and revenue of 7.22B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PG and RKT.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PG and RKT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer