PG vs. IWN
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock, while IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index. Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.64%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for IWN. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. IWN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 16.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed IWN with an annualized return of 8.64%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively higher 10.05% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
IWN
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 16.90%
- 6M
- 16.09%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
PG vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 16.90% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and IWN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.34 |
The correlation between PG and IWN shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank
PG
IWN
PG vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PG | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.37 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 4.65 | -5.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 15.56 | -16.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PG | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 2.19 | -2.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.28 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.39 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
PG vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and IWN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -61.55% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -8.45% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -26.70% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -26.70% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -46.08% | +22.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.91% | -1.91% | -14.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -10.15% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 2.52% | +6.41% |
Volatility
PG vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) at 5.31%. This indicates that PG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | IWN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 5.31% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 12.13% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 17.99% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 21.47% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 23.41% | -4.36% |
Dividends
PG vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than IWN's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and IWN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to IWN (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs IWN's -61.55%.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and IWN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer