PFRL vs. FLOT
PFRL (PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF) and FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFRL is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by PGIM, while FLOT is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. PFRL is actively managed, while FLOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PFRL returned 8.62%/yr vs 5.60%/yr for FLOT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFRL charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLOT.
Performance
PFRL vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PFRL having a 1.96% return and FLOT slightly lower at 1.87%.
PFRL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLOT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
PFRL vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 1.96% | 6.25% | 9.40% | 13.75% | 1.27% |
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.87% | 4.91% | 6.53% | 6.43% | 1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFRL and FLOT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2022 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFRL vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank
PFRL
FLOT
PFRL vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFRL | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 3.22 | -1.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.90 | 11.27 | -6.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.66 | 104.83 | -88.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFRL | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 6.54 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 0.66 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
PFRL vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFRL drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum FLOT drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFRL and FLOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFRL | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -13.54% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.25% | -0.43% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.83% | -1.57% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.02% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -0.21% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.05% | +0.32% |
Volatility
PFRL vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.20%. This indicates that PFRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFRL | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 0.20% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.58% | 0.62% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93% | 0.75% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 1.77% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 4.15% | +0.70% |
PFRL vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFRL has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFRL vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison
PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than FLOT's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.84% | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% |
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 6.83% | 7.34% | 8.96% | 9.84% | 3.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFRL and FLOT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFRL has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to FLOT (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFRL dropped -8.83% vs FLOT's -13.54%.
On 3-year performance, PFRL leads with 8.62% vs 5.60% for FLOT. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PFRL has performed better with a 8.62% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.
PFRL has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 4.54% for FLOT.
PFRL is categorized as Bank Loan, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for PFRL and 0.15% for FLOT.
FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFRL and FLOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer