PFG vs. MET
PFG (Principal Financial Group, Inc.) and MET (MetLife, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — PFG in Insurance - Diversified, MET in Insurance - Life. Over the past 10 years, PFG returned 13.61%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for MET. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PFG vs. MET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFG achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly higher than MET's 8.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFG having a 13.61% annualized return and MET not far behind at 13.20%.
PFG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 21.10%
- 6M
- 22.95%
- 1Y
- 41.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
MET
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 8.90%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
PFG vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 21.10% | 18.38% | 1.87% | -2.83% | 20.10% | 51.35% | -5.19% | 29.71% | -34.96% | 25.52% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 8.48% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFG and MET is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2001 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PFG and MET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PFG:
$6.97
MET:
$7.21
PFG:
15.06
MET:
11.71
PFG:
0.22
MET:
0.39
PFG:
1.95
MET:
0.55
PFG:
$12.07B
MET:
$76.95B
PFG:
$5.76B
MET:
$14.75B
PFG:
$1.39B
MET:
$4.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFG vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank
PFG
MET
PFG vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFG | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.08 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 0.50 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | 1.36 | +9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFG | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 0.38 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.34 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.26 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
PFG vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFG drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, which is greater than MET's maximum drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFG and MET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFG | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.50% | -82.37% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -17.46% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.43% | -21.97% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.32% | -35.09% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.73% | -55.16% | -9.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.15% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -17.63% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 6.42% | -2.73% |
Volatility
PFG vs. MET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) is 4.90%, while MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that PFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFG | MET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 6.33% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 17.47% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.73% | 23.08% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 25.73% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 30.71% | +1.25% |
Dividends
PFG vs. MET - Dividend Comparison
PFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than MET's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.72% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 3.04% | 3.49% | 3.68% | 3.30% | 3.05% | 3.37% | 4.52% | 3.96% | 4.75% | 2.65% | 2.78% | 3.33% |
Financials
PFG vs. MET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Principal Financial Group, Inc. and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PFG and MET have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MET has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to PFG (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFG dropped -91.50% vs MET's -82.37%.
PFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFG and MET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer