PFG vs. FHI

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

PFG (Principal Financial Group, Inc.) and FHI (Federated Hermes, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — PFG in Insurance - Diversified, FHI in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, PFG returned 13.61%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for FHI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

PFG vs. FHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) and Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFG achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly higher than FHI's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PFG has outperformed FHI with an annualized return of 13.61%, while FHI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.31% annualized return.

PFG

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 5.34%
• YTD: 21.10%
• 6M: 22.95%
• 1Y: 41.47%
• 3Y*: 17.87%
• 5Y*: 14.05%
• 10Y*: 13.61%

FHI

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 10.86%
• 6M: 14.99%
• 1Y: 38.36%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 16.33%
• 10Y*: 11.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFG vs. FHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc.	21.10%	18.38%	1.87%	-2.83%	20.10%	51.35%	-5.19%	29.71%	-34.96%	25.52%
FHI Federated Hermes, Inc.	10.86%	30.45%	29.60%	-3.72%	-0.16%	34.68%	-3.79%	27.07%	-23.34%	32.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PFG and FHI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2001	0.57

The correlation between PFG and FHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PFG : $23.14B FHI : $4.14B
EPS PFG : $6.97 FHI : $5.35
PE Ratio PFG : 15.06 FHI : 10.65
PEG Ratio PFG : 0.22 FHI : 0.50
PS Ratio PFG : 1.95 FHI : 2.28
PB Ratio PFG : 1.96 FHI : 2.66
Total Revenue (TTM) PFG : $12.07B FHI : $1.86B
Gross Profit (TTM) PFG : $5.76B FHI : $958.45M
EBITDA (TTM) PFG : $1.39B FHI : $564.21M

Return for Risk

PFG vs. FHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFG

PFG Risk / Return Rank: 86
PFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PFG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PFG Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FHI

FHI Risk / Return Rank: 83
FHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FHI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FHI Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFG vs. FHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) and Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFG	FHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.72	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.26	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	3.07	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	9.52	+1.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFG vs. FHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFG and FHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFG	FHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	1.72	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.66	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.35	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.28	-0.05

Drawdowns

PFG vs. FHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFG drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, which is greater than FHI's maximum drawdown of -64.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFG and FHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFG	FHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.50%	-64.89%	-26.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-12.57%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.43%	-20.17%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.32%	-29.61%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.73%	-64.89%	+0.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-1.63%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.85%	-15.74%	-6.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.69%	4.04%	-0.35%

Volatility

PFG vs. FHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) is 4.90%, while Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that PFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFG	FHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	6.88%	-1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.63%	17.64%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.73%	22.44%	-0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.63%	24.87%	+1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.96%	32.44%	-0.48%

Dividends

PFG vs. FHI - Dividend Comparison

PFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than FHI's 2.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHI Federated Hermes, Inc.	2.46%	2.55%	5.38%	3.38%	2.97%	2.87%	7.20%	3.31%	3.99%	2.77%	7.07%	3.49%
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc.	3.04%	3.49%	3.68%	3.30%	3.05%	3.37%	4.52%	3.96%	4.75%	2.65%	2.78%	3.33%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFG and FHI in my portfolio?

PFG and FHI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFG or FHI?

FHI has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to PFG (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFG dropped -91.50% vs FHI's -64.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.