PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFF vs. VNQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFF vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's -3.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PFF has outperformed VNQI with an annualized return of 3.27%, while VNQI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.19% annualized return.


PFF

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
2.07%
6M
2.58%
1Y
8.08%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*
3.27%

VNQI

1D
0.18%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*
2.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFF vs. VNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
2.07%4.87%7.24%9.22%-18.19%7.15%7.89%15.93%-4.64%8.10%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
-3.93%21.38%-2.22%6.99%-22.94%5.93%-7.22%21.59%-9.44%26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PFF and VNQI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010

0.51

The correlation between PFF and VNQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFF vs. VNQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFF
VNQI

Financial Services

51.6%
1.9%

Real Estate

10.5%
91.2%

Utilities

8.7%
0.1%

Industrials

5.6%
0.7%

Technology

4.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.3%

Healthcare

1.4%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
0.1%

Energy

0.4%
0.3%

Financial Services

PFF
51.6%
VNQI
1.9%

Real Estate

PFF
10.5%
VNQI
91.2%

Utilities

PFF
8.7%
VNQI
0.1%

Industrials

PFF
5.6%
VNQI
0.7%

Technology

PFF
4.9%
VNQI
0.2%

Communication Services

PFF
3.4%
VNQI

-

Basic Materials

PFF
1.6%
VNQI
0.3%

Healthcare

PFF
1.4%
VNQI
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PFF
1.3%
VNQI
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

PFF
1.2%
VNQI
0.1%

Energy

PFF
0.4%
VNQI
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFF vs. VNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFF
PFF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFF Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQI
VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFF vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFVNQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.05

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

0.22

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.73

0.66

+4.08

PFF vs. VNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the VNQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFF and VNQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFVNQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.24

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

-0.14

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.14

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.19

+0.01

Drawdowns

PFF vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than VNQI's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and VNQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFVNQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.55%

-38.35%

-27.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.28%

-14.78%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.63%

-16.35%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-35.75%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-38.35%

+4.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-13.24%

+11.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-10.89%

+5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

4.99%

-3.28%

Volatility

PFF vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) is 2.20%, while Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that PFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFVNQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

3.90%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

11.61%

-6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.84%

13.61%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.31%

15.52%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

16.07%

-3.40%

PFF vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFF vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison

PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than VNQI's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
5.52%6.30%6.32%6.63%6.01%4.45%4.79%5.31%6.32%5.59%5.85%5.76%
VNQI
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF
4.90%4.70%5.16%3.74%0.57%6.48%0.93%7.58%4.62%3.86%5.18%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFF and VNQI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNQI has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to PFF (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs VNQI's -38.35%.

On 10-year performance, PFF leads with 3.27% vs 2.19% for VNQI. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PFF has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PFF has performed better with a 3.27% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PFF.

PFF has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 4.90% for VNQI.

PFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while VNQI is REIT. PFF tracks ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.12% for VNQI.

PFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFF and VNQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer