PFF vs. IGIB
PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF) and IGIB (iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while IGIB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Credit Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PFF returned 3.27%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for IGIB. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFF charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IGIB.
Performance
PFF vs. IGIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFF achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than IGIB's -0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PFF has outperformed IGIB with an annualized return of 3.27%, while IGIB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.
PFF
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
IGIB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 6.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
PFF vs. IGIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 2.07% | 4.87% | 7.24% | 9.22% | -18.19% | 7.15% | 7.89% | 15.93% | -4.64% | 8.10% |
IGIB iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | -0.24% | 9.58% | 3.49% | 9.22% | -14.00% | -1.66% | 9.64% | 14.60% | -0.71% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFF and IGIB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, PFF and IGIB have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFF vs. IGIB — Risk / Return Rank
PFF
IGIB
PFF vs. IGIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFF | IGIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.03 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 6.77 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFF | IGIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.49 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.18 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.49 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.69 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
PFF vs. IGIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFF drawdown since its inception was -65.55%, which is greater than IGIB's maximum drawdown of -20.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFF and IGIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFF | IGIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.55% | -20.62% | -44.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.28% | -3.01% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.63% | -6.05% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | -20.62% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.10% | -20.62% | -13.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -1.78% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -2.58% | -3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.90% | +0.81% |
Volatility
PFF vs. IGIB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) at 1.33%. This indicates that PFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFF | IGIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 1.33% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.17% | 3.12% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.84% | 4.11% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 6.56% | +3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 6.06% | +6.61% |
PFF vs. IGIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFF has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IGIB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFF vs. IGIB - Dividend Comparison
PFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than IGIB's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGIB iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.84% | 4.59% | 4.41% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.52% | 2.74% | 3.44% | 3.41% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 2.51% |
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 5.52% | 6.30% | 6.32% | 6.63% | 6.01% | 4.45% | 4.79% | 5.31% | 6.32% | 5.59% | 5.85% | 5.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFF and IGIB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFF has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to IGIB (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFF dropped -65.55% vs IGIB's -20.62%.
On 10-year performance, PFF leads with 3.27% vs 2.97% for IGIB. On fees, IGIB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IGIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PFF has performed better with a 3.27% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGIB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PFF.
PFF has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 4.84% for IGIB.
PFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while IGIB is Corporate Bonds. PFF tracks ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index, while IGIB tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Credit Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for PFF and 0.06% for IGIB.
IGIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFF and IGIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer