PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDI vs. AOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PDI vs. AOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDI achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than AOD's 9.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PDI has underperformed AOD with an annualized return of 7.56%, while AOD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


PDI

1D
-0.54%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
0.27%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
10.92%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
7.56%

AOD

1D
-1.07%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
9.26%
6M
11.40%
1Y
32.83%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDI vs. AOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
0.27%11.03%17.18%11.99%-16.99%7.81%-9.96%22.23%7.35%18.59%
AOD
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
9.26%32.14%16.03%12.65%-17.15%23.80%8.12%34.83%-17.63%35.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PDI and AOD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2012

0.36

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

PDI:

$2.03B

AOD:

$93.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PDI:

$1.51B

AOD:

$252.71M

EBITDA (TTM)

PDI:

$2.09B

AOD:

$55.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDI vs. AOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDI
PDI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AOD
AOD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDI vs. AOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDIAODDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.40

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

1.97

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

8.62

-8.24

PDI vs. AOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDI Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the AOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDI and AOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDIAODDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

2.11

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.60

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.69

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.15

+0.43

Drawdowns

PDI vs. AOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDI drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum AOD drawdown of -72.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDI and AOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIAODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.47%

-72.26%

+25.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-16.71%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-16.71%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.23%

-28.92%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.47%

-43.68%

-2.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

-4.70%

-2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-27.27%

+21.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

3.82%

+1.16%

Volatility

PDI vs. AOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) is 3.21%, while Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that PDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIAODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

4.26%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.14%

13.38%

-5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

15.64%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

16.72%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

18.58%

+0.47%

Dividends

PDI vs. AOD - Dividend Comparison

PDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.84%, more than AOD's 11.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOD
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
11.85%12.00%10.73%8.56%8.85%6.75%7.80%7.71%9.57%7.29%9.10%8.93%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
15.84%14.94%14.43%14.74%17.84%10.21%10.01%9.45%10.78%8.81%14.79%18.70%

Financials

PDI vs. AOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
615.21M
26.44M
(PDI) Total Revenue
(AOD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PDI and AOD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOD has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to PDI (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDI dropped -46.47% vs AOD's -72.26%.

AOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDI and AOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer