PCY vs. SRLN
PCY (Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF) and SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCY is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index, while SRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by State Street. PCY is passively managed, while SRLN is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PCY returned 2.55%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for SRLN. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRLN.
Performance
PCY vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCY achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PCY has underperformed SRLN with an annualized return of 2.55%, while SRLN has yielded a comparatively higher 4.52% annualized return.
PCY
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 13.56%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
SRLN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 5.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
PCY vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 1.26% | 16.31% | 2.55% | 18.48% | -24.47% | -4.30% | 2.29% | 17.66% | -6.16% | 9.71% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 0.63% | 6.77% | 8.43% | 11.62% | -5.30% | 4.49% | 3.13% | 10.03% | -0.66% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCY and SRLN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2013 | 0.31 |
The correlation between PCY and SRLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PCY vs. SRLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PCY
SRLN
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PCY
SRLN
-
Basic Materials
PCY
-
SRLN
-
Communication Services
PCY
-
SRLN
Consumer Cyclical
PCY
-
SRLN
-
Consumer Defensive
PCY
-
SRLN
-
Energy
PCY
-
SRLN
-
Healthcare
PCY
-
SRLN
-
Industrials
PCY
-
SRLN
Real Estate
PCY
-
SRLN
-
Technology
PCY
-
SRLN
-
Utilities
PCY
-
SRLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCY vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank
PCY
SRLN
PCY vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCY | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.43 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.67 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.34 | 6.17 | +3.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCY | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.88 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 1.17 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.75 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.70 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
PCY vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCY drawdown since its inception was -49.13%, which is greater than SRLN's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCY and SRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCY | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.13% | -22.29% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.91% | -3.26% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.52% | -4.26% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.17% | -7.93% | -29.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.78% | -22.29% | -15.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.17% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -1.10% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 0.88% | +0.58% |
Volatility
PCY vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) at 0.46%. This indicates that PCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCY | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 0.46% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.83% | 2.64% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.46% | 2.89% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 3.91% | +9.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.95% | 6.06% | +6.89% |
PCY vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCY vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison
PCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than SRLN's 7.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 5.91% | 5.93% | 6.65% | 6.48% | 6.81% | 4.80% | 4.45% | 4.78% | 4.93% | 4.80% | 5.19% | 5.46% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 7.50% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCY and SRLN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCY has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to SRLN (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCY dropped -49.13% vs SRLN's -22.29%.
On 10-year performance, SRLN leads with 4.52% vs 2.55% for PCY. On fees, PCY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SRLN has performed better with a 4.52% return vs 2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.50%, compared with 5.91% for PCY.
PCY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SRLN is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PCY and 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCY and SRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer