PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLIX vs. UMBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLIX vs. UMBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLIX achieves a 32.85% return, which is significantly higher than UMBMX's 11.19% return. Over the past 10 years, PCLIX has underperformed UMBMX with an annualized return of 11.65%, while UMBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.


PCLIX

1D
-1.74%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
32.85%
6M
32.08%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
15.90%
10Y*
11.65%

UMBMX

1D
-2.67%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
11.19%
6M
10.54%
1Y
23.17%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLIX vs. UMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
32.85%5.76%8.53%0.69%23.32%43.83%-9.18%19.37%-12.02%10.86%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
11.19%15.46%22.93%12.73%-17.31%15.69%27.28%20.76%-9.83%24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLIX and UMBMX is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.32

The correlation between PCLIX and UMBMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLIX vs. UMBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCLIX
PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBMX
UMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
UMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCLIX vs. UMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) and Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCLIXUMBMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.58

2.64

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

10.41

+4.69

PCLIX vs. UMBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the UMBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLIX and UMBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCLIXUMBMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.66

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.49

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.66

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.58

-0.41

Drawdowns

PCLIX vs. UMBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLIX drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than UMBMX's maximum drawdown of -49.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLIX and UMBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLIXUMBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.60%

-49.91%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-9.19%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.30%

-19.41%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.59%

-26.30%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.78%

-36.91%

-14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.46%

-2.67%

-4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.14%

-7.10%

-17.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.32%

+0.43%

Volatility

PCLIX vs. UMBMX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (UMBMX) at 4.84%. This indicates that PCLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLIXUMBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

4.84%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

11.56%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.56%

14.62%

+4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

17.76%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.54%

19.12%

+21.42%

PCLIX vs. UMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBMX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLIX vs. UMBMX - Dividend Comparison

PCLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than UMBMX's 9.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
1.41%2.45%7.50%5.06%42.60%73.41%0.77%2.46%18.58%12.63%0.16%2.22%
UMBMX
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund
9.26%10.29%15.75%0.17%4.21%11.54%2.40%0.74%8.09%8.38%2.39%8.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCLIX and UMBMX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLIX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to UMBMX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLIX dropped -66.60% vs UMBMX's -49.91%.

PCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLIX and UMBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer