PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBP vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBP vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBP achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly lower than VYMI's 10.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PBP has underperformed VYMI with an annualized return of 7.06%, while VYMI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.


PBP

1D
0.31%
1M
0.78%
YTD
4.30%
6M
5.70%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
7.06%

VYMI

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
10.04%
6M
13.58%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBP vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.30%8.49%19.83%11.59%-11.82%19.97%-3.31%14.60%-5.57%11.98%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
10.04%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%-1.11%18.43%-12.65%22.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PBP and VYMI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2016

0.57

The correlation between PBP and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBP vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBP
VYMI

Technology

39.5%
4.3%

Financial Services

11.4%
41.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
6.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
6.6%

Industrials

7.8%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
7.0%

Energy

3.3%
9.5%

Utilities

2.6%
5.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
6.8%

Technology

PBP
39.5%
VYMI
4.3%

Financial Services

PBP
11.4%
VYMI
41.9%

Communication Services

PBP
10.9%
VYMI
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PBP
10.2%
VYMI
6.5%

Healthcare

PBP
8.6%
VYMI
6.6%

Industrials

PBP
7.8%
VYMI
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

PBP
4.7%
VYMI
7.0%

Energy

PBP
3.3%
VYMI
9.5%

Utilities

PBP
2.6%
VYMI
5.6%

Real Estate

PBP
1.8%
VYMI
1.3%

Basic Materials

PBP
1.8%
VYMI
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBP vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBP vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBPVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.39

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.76

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

10.83

+6.54

PBP vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBP and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBPVYMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.14

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.80

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.63

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.64

-0.30

Drawdowns

PBP vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBP drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, which is greater than VYMI's maximum drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBP and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBPVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.43%

-40.00%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-10.14%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-12.84%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

-24.05%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-40.00%

+6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-2.52%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-6.31%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

2.58%

-1.59%

Volatility

PBP vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is 1.43%, while Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that PBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBPVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

3.69%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

10.94%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

13.13%

-6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.87%

14.87%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

16.88%

-3.21%

PBP vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBP vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than VYMI's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.22%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.48%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBP and VYMI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYMI has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to PBP (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBP dropped -43.43% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 10-year performance, VYMI leads with 10.62% vs 7.06% for PBP. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PBP.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 3.48% for VYMI.

PBP is categorized as Derivative Income, while VYMI is Dividend. PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PBP and 0.07% for VYMI.

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBP and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer