PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBP vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBP vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBP achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -4.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PBP has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 7.06%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.


PBP

1D
0.31%
1M
0.78%
YTD
4.30%
6M
5.70%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
7.06%

SLV

1D
0.02%
1M
-15.66%
YTD
-4.41%
6M
16.83%
1Y
88.38%
3Y*
40.36%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBP vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.30%8.49%19.83%11.59%-11.82%19.97%-3.31%14.60%-5.57%11.98%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.41%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PBP and SLV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2007

0.17

The correlation between PBP and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (10 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBP vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBP
SLV

Technology

39.5%

-

Financial Services

11.4%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

3.3%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
100.0%

Technology

PBP
39.5%
SLV

-

Financial Services

PBP
11.4%
SLV

-

Communication Services

PBP
10.9%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

PBP
10.2%
SLV

-

Healthcare

PBP
8.6%
SLV

-

Industrials

PBP
7.8%
SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

PBP
4.7%
SLV

-

Energy

PBP
3.3%
SLV

-

Utilities

PBP
2.6%
SLV

-

Real Estate

PBP
1.8%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

PBP
1.8%
SLV
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBP vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBP vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.30

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.09

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

4.40

+12.97

PBP vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBP and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBPSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.50

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.53

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.44

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.23

+0.11

Drawdowns

PBP vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBP drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBP and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.43%

-76.28%

+32.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-42.45%

+37.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-42.45%

+27.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

-42.45%

+23.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-42.81%

+9.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-41.69%

+40.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-44.67%

+37.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

20.15%

-19.16%

Volatility

PBP vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is 1.43%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that PBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

16.89%

-15.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

58.88%

-53.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

59.53%

-52.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.87%

36.33%

-24.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

31.92%

-18.25%

PBP vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBP vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.22%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBP and SLV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to PBP (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBP dropped -43.43% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 14.08% vs 7.06% for PBP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 14.08% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

PBP is categorized as Derivative Income, while SLV is Silver. PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PBP and 0.50% for SLV.

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBP and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer