PAVE vs. VRT
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.22%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAVE vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.
PAVE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 18.25%
- 6M
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 33.79%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- —
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 18.25% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.82% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and VRT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.47 |
The correlation between PAVE and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
VRT
PAVE vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAVE | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 6.53 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 18.20 | -7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAVE | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.79 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.03 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.00 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -71.24% | +27.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -24.78% | +12.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -61.28% | +35.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -71.24% | +45.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -20.11% | +16.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -16.22% | +9.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 8.89% | -5.64% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 5.44%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 16.60% | -11.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 45.55% | -30.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 58.11% | -39.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.61% | 61.81% | -40.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 54.61% | -30.23% |
Dividends
PAVE vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.78% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and VRT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to PAVE (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer