PAVE vs. OVL
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) and OVL (Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while OVL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Liquid Strategies. PAVE is passively managed, while OVL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.22%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for OVL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAVE charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OVL.
Performance
PAVE vs. OVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly higher than OVL's 10.47% return.
PAVE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 18.25%
- 6M
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 33.79%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- —
OVL
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 29.22%
- 3Y*
- 23.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE vs. OVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 18.25% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 10.47% |
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 10.47% | 17.81% | 27.91% | 28.01% | -22.18% | 32.40% | 20.17% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and OVL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between PAVE and OVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAVE vs. OVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAVE
OVL
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PAVE
OVL
Basic Materials
PAVE
OVL
Utilities
PAVE
OVL
Technology
PAVE
OVL
Consumer Defensive
PAVE
OVL
Energy
PAVE
OVL
Communication Services
PAVE
-
OVL
Consumer Cyclical
PAVE
-
OVL
Financial Services
PAVE
-
OVL
Healthcare
PAVE
-
OVL
Real Estate
PAVE
-
OVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. OVL — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
OVL
PAVE vs. OVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAVE | OVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.36 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 14.80 | -4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAVE | OVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.06 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.78 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. OVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, which is greater than OVL's maximum drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and OVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | OVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -35.49% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -8.73% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -21.73% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -29.23% | +3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -3.33% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -6.70% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 1.98% | +1.27% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. OVL - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) at 4.23%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | OVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 4.23% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 10.95% | +4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 14.31% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.61% | 19.84% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 22.55% | +1.83% |
PAVE vs. OVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAVE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than OVL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAVE vs. OVL - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than OVL's 6.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 6.33% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 3.85% | 3.63% | 2.43% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.78% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and OVL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to OVL (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs OVL's -35.49%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.22% vs 13.78% for OVL. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, OVL has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.22% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVL.
OVL has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 0.78% for PAVE.
PAVE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while OVL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for PAVE and 0.79% for OVL.
OVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and OVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer