PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAVE vs. ETN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAVE vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 18.25% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 27.32% return.


PAVE

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
18.25%
6M
17.47%
1Y
33.79%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*

ETN

1D
1.82%
1M
0.41%
YTD
27.32%
6M
18.09%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
30.80%
5Y*
24.42%
10Y*
23.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
18.25%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%14.11%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
27.32%-2.79%39.51%56.22%-7.18%46.70%29.88%42.76%-10.04%12.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and ETN is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.78

The correlation between PAVE and ETN shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAVE vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
ETN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAVEETNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.14

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.21

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

2.63

+7.79

PAVE vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and ETN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAVEETNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.71

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.82

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.42

+0.25

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and ETN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAVEETNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.08%

-68.95%

+24.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-19.14%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-34.46%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-34.46%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-6.64%

+3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-14.90%

+8.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

8.78%

-5.53%

Volatility

PAVE vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 5.44%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 12.39%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAVEETNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

12.39%

-6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.24%

25.71%

-10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

32.58%

-13.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.61%

30.03%

-8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.38%

30.01%

-5.63%

Dividends

PAVE vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than ETN's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.06%1.31%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%1.88%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.78%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAVE and ETN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETN has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to PAVE (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs ETN's -68.95%.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAVE and ETN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer