PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PANW vs. VFEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PANW vs. VFEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PANW is traded in USD, while VFEG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VFEG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 44.59% return, which is significantly higher than VFEG.L's 8.09% return.


PANW

1D
-2.10%
1M
28.12%
YTD
44.59%
6M
36.33%
1Y
33.43%
3Y*
34.26%
5Y*
35.30%
10Y*
28.39%

VFEG.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
8.09%
6M
9.44%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PANW vs. VFEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
44.59%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%10.27%
VFEG.L
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc
8.09%26.00%12.22%6.63%-17.18%-0.91%14.68%-10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PANW and VFEG.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.22

The correlation between PANW and VFEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PANW vs. VFEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VFEG.L
VFEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PANW vs. VFEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PANWVFEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.22

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

7.75

-5.63

PANW vs. VFEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the VFEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and VFEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PANWVFEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.55

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.20

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.20

+0.51

Drawdowns

PANW vs. VFEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, which is greater than VFEG.L's maximum drawdown of -39.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and VFEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PANWVFEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-39.28%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-11.01%

-25.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-20.69%

-15.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-33.48%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.37%

-4.68%

-6.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-14.94%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.82%

3.16%

+12.66%

Volatility

PANW vs. VFEG.L - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 17.10% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Acc (VFEG.L) at 6.08%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PANWVFEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.10%

6.08%

+11.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.83%

12.96%

+18.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.54%

15.82%

+22.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.65%

22.04%

+19.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.59%

23.80%

+14.79%

Dividends

PANW vs. VFEG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PANW nor VFEG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PANW and VFEG.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PANW and VFEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer