PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO
PAAS.TO (Pan American Silver Corp.) and LUN.TO (Lundin Mining Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — PAAS.TO in Silver, LUN.TO in Copper. Over the past 10 years, PAAS.TO returned 14.58%/yr vs 27.33%/yr for LUN.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAAS.TO achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than LUN.TO's 29.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PAAS.TO has underperformed LUN.TO with an annualized return of 14.58%, while LUN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 27.33% annualized return.
PAAS.TO
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -18.40%
- YTD
- -6.95%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 70.16%
- 3Y*
- 50.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
LUN.TO
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 29.22%
- 6M
- 50.43%
- 1Y
- 164.52%
- 3Y*
- 59.24%
- 5Y*
- 28.33%
- 10Y*
- 27.33%
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAAS.TO Pan American Silver Corp. | -6.95% | 148.70% | 37.51% | 0.37% | -28.30% | -27.43% | 43.89% | 55.86% | 2.74% | -2.74% |
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 29.22% | 141.86% | 17.72% | 35.67% | -11.74% | -9.34% | 49.12% | 40.12% | -31.40% | 32.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAAS.TO and LUN.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.35 |
The correlation between PAAS.TO and LUN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (10 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PAAS.TO:
CA$27.78B
LUN.TO:
CA$32.76B
PAAS.TO:
CA$3.21
LUN.TO:
CA$1.69
PAAS.TO:
20.49
LUN.TO:
22.54
PAAS.TO:
0.11
LUN.TO:
0.14
PAAS.TO:
6.49
LUN.TO:
8.10
PAAS.TO:
3.78
LUN.TO:
4.78
PAAS.TO:
CA$4.02B
LUN.TO:
CA$4.04B
PAAS.TO:
CA$1.76B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.55B
PAAS.TO:
CA$2.14B
LUN.TO:
CA$1.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PAAS.TO
LUN.TO
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS.TO) and Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAAS.TO | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.45 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 4.92 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 16.40 | -10.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAAS.TO | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 3.15 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.62 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.60 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.15 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAAS.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.35%, smaller than the maximum LUN.TO drawdown of -95.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAS.TO and LUN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAAS.TO | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.35% | -95.33% | +15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.01% | -33.67% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.01% | -47.11% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.18% | -53.91% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.06% | -57.61% | -8.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.24% | -14.17% | -15.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.44% | -48.72% | +8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | 10.08% | +1.45% |
Volatility
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS.TO) is 18.96%, while Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) has a volatility of 20.66%. This indicates that PAAS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAAS.TO | LUN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.96% | 20.66% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.79% | 44.38% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.32% | 52.71% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.79% | 46.18% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.51% | 45.95% | +1.56% |
Dividends
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO - Dividend Comparison
PAAS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than LUN.TO's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.29% | 0.68% | 3.64% | 3.32% | 5.66% | 3.95% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 2.13% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAAS.TO Pan American Silver Corp. | 1.30% | 0.91% | 1.89% | 2.51% | 2.63% | 1.08% | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.67% | 0.33% | 3.86% |
Financials
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pan American Silver Corp. and Lundin Mining Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAAS.TO vs. LUN.TO - Profitability Comparison
PAAS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 608.00M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
LUN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a gross profit of 537.50M and revenue of 1.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
PAAS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 560.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.5%.
LUN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported an operating income of 503.80M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.5%.
PAAS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pan American Silver Corp. reported a net income of 457.00M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
LUN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Mining Corporation reported a net income of 281.40M and revenue of 1.16B, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAAS.TO and LUN.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PAAS.TO and LUN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer