OVL vs. PAVE
OVL (Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OVL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Liquid Strategies, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. OVL is actively managed, while PAVE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OVL returned 13.78%/yr vs 17.22%/yr for PAVE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OVL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
OVL vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OVL achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 18.25% return.
OVL
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 29.22%
- 3Y*
- 23.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 18.25%
- 6M
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 33.79%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- —
OVL vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 10.47% | 17.81% | 27.91% | 28.01% | -22.18% | 32.40% | 20.17% | 8.73% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 18.25% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 10.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between OVL and PAVE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between OVL and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OVL vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OVL
PAVE
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
OVL
PAVE
Financial Services
OVL
PAVE
-
Communication Services
OVL
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
OVL
PAVE
-
Healthcare
OVL
PAVE
-
Industrials
OVL
PAVE
Consumer Defensive
OVL
PAVE
Energy
OVL
PAVE
Utilities
OVL
PAVE
Real Estate
OVL
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
OVL
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OVL vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
OVL
PAVE
OVL vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OVL | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 2.85 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.80 | 10.42 | +4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OVL | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.80 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.80 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.67 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
OVL vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OVL drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVL and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OVL | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -44.08% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -11.91% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | -26.23% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | -26.23% | -3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -3.15% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -6.23% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 3.25% | -1.27% |
Volatility
OVL vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) is 4.23%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that OVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OVL | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 5.44% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 15.24% | -4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 18.90% | -4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 21.61% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 24.38% | -1.83% |
OVL vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OVL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
OVL vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
OVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than PAVE's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF | 6.33% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 3.33% | 3.85% | 3.63% | 2.43% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.78% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OVL and PAVE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to OVL (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVL dropped -35.49% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.22% vs 13.78% for OVL. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, OVL has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.22% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVL.
OVL has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 0.78% for PAVE.
OVL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OVL and 0.47% for PAVE.
OVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OVL and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer