OUSM vs. ATMP
OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - OUSM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSM returned 7.32%/yr vs 15.42%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OUSM charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.
Performance
OUSM vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 19.92% return.
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 6.25%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 19.92%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 21.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.42%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
OUSM vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 6.25% | 2.17% | 13.45% | 18.82% | -7.89% | 21.45% | 7.64% | 28.04% | -10.60% | 10.85% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 19.92% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSM and ATMP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OUSM and ATMP has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSM vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
OUSM
ATMP
OUSM vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUSM | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.53 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 6.05 | -2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUSM | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.31 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.70 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.09 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
OUSM vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSM | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.84% | -80.86% | +41.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -7.30% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -16.48% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.44% | -22.98% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -6.15% | +3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -31.12% | +25.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 3.04% | +0.11% |
Volatility
OUSM vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 3.47%, while Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSM | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 5.72% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 10.93% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | 14.17% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 22.25% | -5.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 27.69% | -8.76% |
OUSM vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSM vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.08% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSM and ATMP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATMP has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to OUSM (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs ATMP's -80.86%.
On 5-year performance, ATMP leads with 15.42% vs 7.32% for OUSM. On fees, OUSM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ATMP has performed better with a 15.42% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
OUSM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ATMP is MLPs. OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.95% for ATMP.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSM and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer