ORCL vs. NLR
ORCL (Oracle Corporation) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, ORCL returned 20.30%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for NLR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ORCL vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORCL achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ORCL has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 20.30%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.
ORCL
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- 22.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.94%
- 5Y*
- 21.81%
- 10Y*
- 20.30%
NLR
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -12.54%
- YTD
- -0.79%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 31.16%
- 5Y*
- 20.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
ORCL vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORCL Oracle Corporation | 9.34% | 18.13% | 59.99% | 30.94% | -4.65% | 36.89% | 24.25% | 19.34% | -2.97% | 24.94% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -0.79% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORCL and NLR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2007 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORCL vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
ORCL
NLR
ORCL vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oracle Corporation (ORCL) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ORCL | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.04 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 2.08 | -1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORCL | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.63 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.69 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.16 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
ORCL vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORCL drawdown since its inception was -84.19%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCL and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORCL | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.19% | -65.05% | -19.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.25% | -25.80% | -32.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.25% | -30.48% | -27.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.25% | -30.48% | -27.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.25% | -34.35% | -23.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.98% | -25.03% | -9.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.10% | -35.71% | +6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.04% | 12.87% | +22.17% |
Volatility
ORCL vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) has a higher volatility of 21.62% compared to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) at 13.36%. This indicates that ORCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORCL | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.62% | 13.36% | +8.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.42% | 33.24% | +9.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.38% | 42.96% | +22.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 29.43% | +12.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 24.14% | +10.87% |
Dividends
ORCL vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
ORCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than NLR's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.57% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
ORCL Oracle Corporation | 0.94% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.57% | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.72% | 1.68% | 1.52% | 1.56% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORCL and NLR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ORCL has higher volatility (21.62%) compared to NLR (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORCL dropped -84.19% vs NLR's -65.05%.
NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ORCL and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer