OR vs. RGLD
OR (Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd) and RGLD (Royal Gold, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, OR returned 11.48%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for RGLD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
OR vs. RGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OR achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly higher than RGLD's -7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, OR has underperformed RGLD with an annualized return of 11.48%, while RGLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
OR
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 29.45%
- 5Y*
- 19.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
RGLD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -13.90%
- YTD
- -7.10%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 17.94%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
OR vs. RGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd | -4.40% | 96.95% | 28.14% | 19.96% | 0.02% | -2.01% | 32.58% | 12.20% | -22.72% | 20.74% |
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | -7.10% | 70.43% | 10.39% | 8.70% | 8.51% | 0.04% | -12.13% | 44.27% | 5.53% | 31.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between OR and RGLD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between OR and RGLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
OR:
$6.37B
RGLD:
$17.49B
OR:
$1.34
RGLD:
$8.53
OR:
25.16
RGLD:
24.12
OR:
0.14
RGLD:
1.64
OR:
19.65
RGLD:
11.71
OR:
4.31
RGLD:
2.36
OR:
$325.18M
RGLD:
$1.31B
OR:
$275.03M
RGLD:
$579.68M
OR:
$330.83M
RGLD:
$949.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OR vs. RGLD — Risk / Return Rank
OR
RGLD
OR vs. RGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OR | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.11 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 0.56 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 1.42 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OR | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.46 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.39 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.40 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.18 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
OR vs. RGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OR drawdown since its inception was -61.90%, smaller than the maximum RGLD drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OR and RGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OR | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.90% | -98.29% | +36.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.13% | -32.28% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.13% | -32.28% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.18% | -40.73% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.90% | -49.55% | -12.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -32.28% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.05% | -29.82% | +11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.73% | 12.67% | +1.06% |
Volatility
OR vs. RGLD - Volatility Comparison
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) has a higher volatility of 13.29% compared to Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) at 11.83%. This indicates that OR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OR | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.29% | 11.83% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.69% | 32.02% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.71% | 39.07% | +5.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.68% | 31.54% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.47% | 33.63% | +4.84% |
Dividends
OR vs. RGLD - Dividend Comparison
OR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than RGLD's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd | 0.65% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.81% | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.05% | 0.87% | 1.17% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% |
Financials
OR vs. RGLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd and Royal Gold, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OR vs. RGLD - Profitability Comparison
OR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported a gross profit of 87.28M and revenue of 101.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.1%.
RGLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 469.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
OR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported an operating income of 79.13M and revenue of 101.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.0%.
RGLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.09M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 63.3%.
OR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported a net income of 72.56M and revenue of 101.41M, resulting in a net margin of 71.6%.
RGLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Gold, Inc. reported a net income of 281.13M and revenue of 469.13M, resulting in a net margin of 59.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OR and RGLD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OR has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to RGLD (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OR dropped -61.90% vs RGLD's -98.29%.
OR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OR and RGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer