OLO vs. RELY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

OLO (Olo Inc.) and RELY (Remitly Global, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — OLO in Software - Application, RELY in Software - Infrastructure. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OLO vs. RELY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olo Inc. (OLO) and Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OLO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RELY

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -23.22%
• YTD: 33.70%
• 6M: 36.57%
• 1Y: -14.35%
• 3Y*: -1.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLO vs. RELY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OLO Olo Inc.	0.00%	33.59%	34.27%	-8.48%	-69.97%	-38.83%
RELY Remitly Global, Inc.	33.70%	-38.86%	16.22%	69.61%	-44.47%	-57.44%

Correlation

The correlation between OLO and RELY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021	0.43

The correlation between OLO and RELY shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap OLO : $1.87B RELY : $4.00B
EPS OLO : -$0.00 RELY : $0.49
PS Ratio OLO : 5.95 RELY : 2.32
PB Ratio OLO : 2.64 RELY : 4.41
Total Revenue (TTM) OLO : $314.33M RELY : $1.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) OLO : $167.55M RELY : $753.03M
EBITDA (TTM) OLO : $16.56M RELY : $142.85M

Return for Risk

OLO vs. RELY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RELY

RELY Risk / Return Rank: 31
RELY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
RELY Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
RELY Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RELY Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
RELY Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLO vs. RELY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olo Inc. (OLO) and Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OLO	RELY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.32	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	OLO	RELY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-85.80%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-40.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-57.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-61.92%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-64.50%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OLO	RELY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	38.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	55.84%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	59.08%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	59.08%	—

Dividends

OLO vs. RELY - Dividend Comparison

Neither OLO nor RELY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

OLO vs. RELY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Olo Inc. and Remitly Global, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

OLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.93M and revenue of 85.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

RELY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Remitly Global, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 452.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

OLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported an operating income of -2.70M and revenue of 85.72M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.2%.

RELY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Remitly Global, Inc. reported an operating income of 53.74M and revenue of 452.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

OLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported a net income of 1.58M and revenue of 85.72M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

RELY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Remitly Global, Inc. reported a net income of 49.05M and revenue of 452.80M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OLO and RELY in my portfolio?

OLO and RELY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.