OLO vs. NCNO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

OLO (Olo Inc.) and NCNO (nCino, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OLO vs. NCNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olo Inc. (OLO) and nCino, Inc. (NCNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OLO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NCNO

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -15.27%
• YTD: -41.34%
• 6M: -38.81%
• 1Y: -44.95%
• 3Y*: -14.43%
• 5Y*: -24.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLO vs. NCNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OLO Olo Inc.	0.00%	33.59%	34.27%	-8.48%	-69.97%	-34.97%
NCNO nCino, Inc.	-41.34%	-23.65%	-0.15%	27.19%	-51.80%	-20.27%

Correlation

The correlation between OLO and NCNO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2021	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between OLO and NCNO has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap OLO : $1.87B NCNO : $1.65B
EPS OLO : -$0.00 NCNO : $0.12
PS Ratio OLO : 5.95 NCNO : 2.81
PB Ratio OLO : 2.64 NCNO : 1.70
Total Revenue (TTM) OLO : $314.33M NCNO : $610.06M
Gross Profit (TTM) OLO : $167.55M NCNO : $374.67M
EBITDA (TTM) OLO : $16.56M NCNO : $49.42M

Return for Risk

OLO vs. NCNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCNO

NCNO Risk / Return Rank: 8
NCNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NCNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NCNO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
NCNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
NCNO Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLO vs. NCNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olo Inc. (OLO) and nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OLO	NCNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.49	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	OLO	NCNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-85.71%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-57.14%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-67.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-84.66%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.10%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	32.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OLO	NCNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	37.56%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	46.13%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	53.41%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	54.23%	—

Dividends

OLO vs. NCNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither OLO nor NCNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

OLO vs. NCNO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Olo Inc. and nCino, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

OLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported a gross profit of 43.93M and revenue of 85.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

NCNO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nCino, Inc. reported a gross profit of 100.94M and revenue of 159.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.3%.

OLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported an operating income of -2.70M and revenue of 85.72M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.2%.

NCNO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nCino, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.12M and revenue of 159.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

OLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olo Inc. reported a net income of 1.58M and revenue of 85.72M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.

NCNO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nCino, Inc. reported a net income of 13.64M and revenue of 159.41M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OLO and NCNO in my portfolio?

OLO and NCNO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.