PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OLED vs. DRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OLED vs. DRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Display Corporation (OLED) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OLED achieves a -23.54% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 37.10% return.


OLED

1D
3.15%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
-23.54%
6M
-26.66%
1Y
-40.39%
3Y*
-13.73%
5Y*
-15.39%
10Y*
3.20%

DRS

1D
0.87%
1M
12.79%
YTD
37.10%
6M
37.79%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
42.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLED vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
-23.54%-19.07%-22.88%78.64%0.43%
DRS
Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock
37.10%6.56%61.23%56.81%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between OLED and DRS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022

0.30

The correlation between OLED and DRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

OLED:

$4.49

DRS:

$1.44

PE Ratio

OLED:

19.78

DRS:

32.36

PEG Ratio

OLED:

2.71

DRS:

1.92

PS Ratio

OLED:

6.74

DRS:

2.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

OLED:

$626.55M

DRS:

$3.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OLED:

$465.05M

DRS:

$894.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

OLED:

$277.56M

DRS:

$433.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OLED vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OLED
OLED Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
OLED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLED Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLED Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
OLED Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLED Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DRS
DRS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLED vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Display Corporation (OLED) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OLEDDRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.06

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

0.18

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

0.36

-1.88

OLED vs. DRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OLED Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the DRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OLED and DRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OLEDDRSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.06

0.15

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

1.34

-1.21

Drawdowns

OLED vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OLED drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLED and DRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OLEDDRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.55%

-32.48%

-53.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.99%

-32.48%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.74%

-32.48%

-30.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.11%

-4.53%

-59.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.19%

-7.23%

-37.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.64%

16.05%

+10.59%

Volatility

OLED vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison

Universal Display Corporation (OLED) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) have volatilities of 11.17% and 11.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OLEDDRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.17%

11.11%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.29%

30.76%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.14%

39.89%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.81%

38.47%

+5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.45%

38.47%

+8.98%

Dividends

OLED vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison

OLED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than DRS's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRS
Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock
0.77%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
2.08%1.54%1.09%0.73%1.11%0.48%0.26%0.19%0.26%0.07%

Financials

OLED vs. DRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Display Corporation and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
142.21M
846.00M
(OLED) Total Revenue
(DRS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OLED vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Display Corporation and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.6%
25.1%
Portfolio components
OLED - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a gross profit of 106.09M and revenue of 142.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

DRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 846.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

OLED - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported an operating income of 42.75M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

DRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 77.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

OLED - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a net income of 35.90M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.

DRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 62.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OLED and DRS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OLED has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to DRS (11.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLED dropped -85.55% vs DRS's -32.48%.

DRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OLED and DRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer