OLED vs. CLS
OLED (Universal Display Corporation) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — OLED in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, CLS in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, OLED returned 3.20%/yr vs 43.16%/yr for CLS. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OLED vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OLED achieves a -23.54% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 30.75% return. Over the past 10 years, OLED has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 3.20%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.16% annualized return.
OLED
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- -23.54%
- 6M
- -26.66%
- 1Y
- -40.39%
- 3Y*
- -13.73%
- 5Y*
- -15.39%
- 10Y*
- 3.20%
CLS
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 30.75%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 220.14%
- 3Y*
- 209.55%
- 5Y*
- 114.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.16%
OLED vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLED Universal Display Corporation | -23.54% | -19.07% | -22.88% | 78.64% | -33.87% | -27.89% | 11.91% | 120.74% | -45.69% | 206.97% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 30.75% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between OLED and CLS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998 | 0.33 |
The correlation between OLED and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OLED:
$4.19B
CLS:
$44.72B
OLED:
$4.49
CLS:
$8.28
OLED:
19.78
CLS:
46.65
OLED:
2.71
CLS:
0.63
OLED:
6.74
CLS:
3.24
OLED:
2.46
CLS:
21.31
OLED:
$626.55M
CLS:
$13.81B
OLED:
$465.05M
CLS:
$1.60B
OLED:
$277.56M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OLED vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
OLED
CLS
OLED vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Display Corporation (OLED) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OLED | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.39 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 7.58 | -8.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 18.88 | -20.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OLED | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.06 | 3.06 | -4.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 2.01 | -2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.87 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.27 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
OLED vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OLED drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLED and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OLED | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.55% | -96.93% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.99% | -29.24% | -16.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.74% | -53.96% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.74% | -53.96% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.20% | -80.60% | +15.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.11% | -18.18% | -45.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.19% | -73.36% | +28.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.64% | 11.72% | +14.92% |
Volatility
OLED vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is 11.17%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 26.60%. This indicates that OLED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OLED | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | 26.60% | -15.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.29% | 55.08% | -25.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.14% | 72.52% | -34.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.81% | 57.62% | -13.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 49.93% | -2.48% |
Dividends
OLED vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
OLED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OLED Universal Display Corporation | 2.08% | 1.54% | 1.09% | 0.73% | 1.11% | 0.48% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.26% | 0.07% |
Financials
OLED vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Display Corporation and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OLED vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
OLED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a gross profit of 106.09M and revenue of 142.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
OLED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported an operating income of 42.75M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
OLED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Display Corporation reported a net income of 35.90M and revenue of 142.21M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OLED and CLS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (26.60%) compared to OLED (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLED dropped -85.55% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OLED and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer