PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OKTA vs. RIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OKTA vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Okta, Inc. (OKTA) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OKTA achieves a 35.13% return, which is significantly higher than RIO's 29.64% return.


OKTA

1D
-1.58%
1M
39.27%
YTD
35.13%
6M
33.86%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
-11.66%
10Y*

RIO

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
29.64%
6M
42.09%
1Y
80.02%
3Y*
23.43%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
21.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OKTA vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OKTA
Okta, Inc.
35.13%9.73%-12.96%32.49%-69.52%-11.83%120.39%80.83%149.12%8.93%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
29.64%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between OKTA and RIO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2017

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OKTA:

$20.76B

RIO:

$165.37B

EPS

OKTA:

$0.96

RIO:

$13.11

PE Ratio

OKTA:

121.27

RIO:

7.70

PS Ratio

OKTA:

9.40

RIO:

1.48

PB Ratio

OKTA:

3.01K

RIO:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

OKTA:

$2.23B

RIO:

$111.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OKTA:

$1.73B

RIO:

$31.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

OKTA:

$235.06M

RIO:

$40.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OKTA vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OKTA
OKTA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
OKTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OKTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OKTA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
OKTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
OKTA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OKTA vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okta, Inc. (OKTA) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OKTARIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.43

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

5.30

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.71

20.21

-19.50

OKTA vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OKTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OKTA and RIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OKTARIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

2.79

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.38

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.33

+0.03

Drawdowns

OKTA vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OKTA drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, roughly equal to the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKTA and RIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OKTARIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.57%

-88.97%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.82%

-15.19%

-22.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.57%

-24.19%

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.43%

-35.25%

-48.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.95%

-9.92%

-50.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.25%

-23.77%

-14.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.44%

3.97%

+14.47%

Volatility

OKTA vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Okta, Inc. (OKTA) has a higher volatility of 33.10% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 11.37%. This indicates that OKTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OKTARIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.10%

11.37%

+21.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.85%

23.90%

+23.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.61%

28.93%

+25.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.49%

29.23%

+28.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.01%

30.63%

+23.38%

Dividends

OKTA vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

OKTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OKTA
Okta, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.98%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

OKTA vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okta, Inc. and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
765.00K
30.65B
(OKTA) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OKTA vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Okta, Inc. and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
77.8%
26.6%
Portfolio components
OKTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported a gross profit of 595.00K and revenue of 765.00K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.8%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

OKTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.00K and revenue of 765.00K, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

OKTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported a net income of 74.00K and revenue of 765.00K, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OKTA and RIO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OKTA has higher volatility (33.10%) compared to RIO (11.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OKTA dropped -84.57% vs RIO's -88.97%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OKTA and RIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer