PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OKTA vs. QQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Okta, Inc. (OKTA) and QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

OKTA is traded in USD, while QQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OKTA achieves a 35.13% return, which is significantly higher than QQ.L's 7.41% return.


OKTA

1D
-1.58%
1M
39.27%
YTD
35.13%
6M
33.86%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
-11.66%
10Y*

QQ.L

1D
1.12%
1M
10.48%
YTD
7.41%
6M
13.69%
1Y
-13.24%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OKTA
Okta, Inc.
35.13%9.73%-12.96%32.49%-69.52%-11.83%120.39%80.83%149.12%8.93%
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
7.41%16.51%34.93%-6.83%22.49%-15.85%-5.88%32.93%19.94%-8.56%

Correlation

The correlation between OKTA and QQ.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2017

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OKTA:

$20.76B

QQ.L:

£2.48B

EPS

OKTA:

$0.96

QQ.L:

-£0.14

PS Ratio

OKTA:

9.40

QQ.L:

0.67

PB Ratio

OKTA:

3.01K

QQ.L:

4.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

OKTA:

$2.23B

QQ.L:

£3.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OKTA:

$1.73B

QQ.L:

£372.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

OKTA:

$235.06M

QQ.L:

£533.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OKTA vs. QQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OKTA
OKTA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
OKTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OKTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OKTA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
OKTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
OKTA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QQ.L
QQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Okta, Inc. (OKTA) and QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OKTAQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.96

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

-0.49

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.71

-0.95

+1.66

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OKTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the QQ.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OKTA and QQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OKTAQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

-0.40

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.22

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.16

+0.20

Drawdowns

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OKTA drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, which is greater than QQ.L's maximum drawdown of -61.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKTA and QQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OKTAQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.57%

-61.16%

-23.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.82%

-27.17%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.57%

-32.62%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.43%

-33.81%

-49.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.95%

-16.77%

-43.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.25%

-20.64%

-17.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.44%

13.11%

+5.33%

Volatility

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Okta, Inc. (OKTA) has a higher volatility of 33.10% compared to QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) at 12.12%. This indicates that OKTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OKTAQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.10%

12.12%

+20.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.85%

23.27%

+24.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.61%

32.69%

+21.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.49%

32.44%

+25.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.01%

31.02%

+22.99%

Dividends

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Dividend Comparison

OKTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OKTA
Okta, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
1.90%2.00%1.99%2.49%2.04%2.59%2.06%1.84%2.20%2.60%2.17%1.99%

Financials

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Okta, Inc. and QinetiQ Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
765.00K
1.02B
(OKTA) Total Revenue
(QQ.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. OKTA values in USD, QQ.L values in GBp

OKTA vs. QQ.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Okta, Inc. and QinetiQ Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
77.8%
10.8%
Portfolio components
OKTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported a gross profit of 595.00K and revenue of 765.00K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.8%.

QQ.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

OKTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.00K and revenue of 765.00K, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

QQ.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

OKTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported a net income of 74.00K and revenue of 765.00K, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

QQ.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OKTA and QQ.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OKTA and QQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer