PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
O vs. NMFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

O vs. NMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Realty Income Corporation (O) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, O achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than NMFC's -11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, O has underperformed NMFC with an annualized return of 4.43%, while NMFC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.08% annualized return.


O

1D
-1.36%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
8.78%
6M
7.49%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
4.43%

NMFC

1D
-0.51%
1M
-5.92%
YTD
-11.79%
6M
-13.53%
1Y
-16.84%
3Y*
-3.49%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
6.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

O vs. NMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
O
Realty Income Corporation
8.78%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
-11.79%-7.17%-0.95%15.47%-0.55%31.94%-7.13%20.64%2.78%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between O and NMFC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2011

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between O and NMFC has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

O:

$1.17

NMFC:

$328.53

PE Ratio

O:

51.10

NMFC:

0.02

PS Ratio

O:

6.91

NMFC:

2.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

O:

$5.92B

NMFC:

$315.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

O:

$3.89B

NMFC:

$203.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

O:

$3.93B

NMFC:

$106.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

O vs. NMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NMFC
NMFC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

O vs. NMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Realty Income Corporation (O) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONMFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.89

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

-0.69

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

-1.35

+4.28

O vs. NMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current O Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the NMFC Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of O and NMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONMFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

-0.75

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

-0.00

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.24

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.31

+0.18

Drawdowns

O vs. NMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum O drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum NMFC drawdown of -64.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for O and NMFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONMFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-64.16%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-24.56%

+13.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.49%

-27.77%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-27.77%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-64.16%

+15.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.00%

-23.29%

+13.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-5.45%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

12.48%

-7.98%

Volatility

O vs. NMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Realty Income Corporation (O) is 4.81%, while New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that O experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONMFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

6.73%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.89%

18.23%

-6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

22.67%

-6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

18.54%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

25.91%

-0.27%

Dividends

O vs. NMFC - Dividend Comparison

O's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than NMFC's 16.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMFC
New Mountain Finance Corporation
16.43%13.90%12.17%11.40%9.86%8.76%10.92%9.90%10.81%10.04%9.65%10.45%
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.39%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%

Financials

O vs. NMFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Realty Income Corporation and New Mountain Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.55B
68.79M
(O) Total Revenue
(NMFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


O and NMFC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMFC has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to O (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, O dropped -48.45% vs NMFC's -64.16%.

O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for O and NMFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer