PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWG vs. DB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NWG vs. DB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NatWest Group plc (NWG) and Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (DB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWG achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly higher than DB's -15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NWG has outperformed DB with an annualized return of 15.97%, while DB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.


NWG

1D
0.76%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
0.44%
1Y
17.10%
3Y*
43.71%
5Y*
30.30%
10Y*
15.97%

DB

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.32%
YTD
-15.73%
6M
-11.29%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
47.97%
5Y*
19.93%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWG vs. DB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWG
NatWest Group plc
-5.18%81.29%92.31%-4.69%11.23%39.24%-24.92%29.18%-26.25%38.16%
DB
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
-15.73%132.42%29.52%21.34%-5.86%14.68%40.10%-2.89%-56.72%18.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NWG and DB is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2007

0.64

The correlation between NWG and DB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

NWG:

$2.95

DB:

$4.47

PE Ratio

NWG:

5.39

DB:

7.02

PEG Ratio

NWG:

0.20

DB:

0.12

PS Ratio

NWG:

1.09

DB:

0.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

NWG:

$29.58B

DB:

$53.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NWG:

$16.97B

DB:

$30.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

NWG:

$9.10B

DB:

$9.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWG vs. DB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWG
NWG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DB
DB Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWG vs. DB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NatWest Group plc (NWG) and Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (DB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWGDBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

0.53

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.80

1.25

+0.55

NWG vs. DB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWG Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the DB Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWG and DB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWGDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.47

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.54

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.26

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.03

-0.14

Drawdowns

NWG vs. DB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWG drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, roughly equal to the maximum DB drawdown of -94.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWG and DB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWGDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.96%

-94.73%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.03%

-29.66%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.62%

-29.66%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.56%

-54.19%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.34%

-71.97%

+4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.45%

-65.16%

-6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.22%

-53.67%

-32.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.60%

12.43%

-2.83%

Volatility

NWG vs. DB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NatWest Group plc (NWG) is 8.65%, while Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (DB) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that NWG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWGDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

9.71%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.92%

25.20%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.41%

32.88%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.53%

37.43%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.32%

40.26%

-1.94%

Dividends

NWG vs. DB - Dividend Comparison

NWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than DB's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DB
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
3.72%1.99%2.87%2.40%1.84%0.00%0.00%1.58%1.58%1.00%0.00%3.11%
NWG
NatWest Group plc
5.51%3.69%4.36%9.42%11.57%2.74%4.59%9.75%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NWG vs. DB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NatWest Group plc and Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
7.39B
15.29B
(NWG) Total Revenue
(DB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NWG vs. DB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NatWest Group plc and Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
59.0%
53.3%
Portfolio components
NWG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.36B and revenue of 7.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

DB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 15.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.

NWG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

DB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft reported an operating income of 3.04B and revenue of 15.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

NWG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NatWest Group plc reported a net income of 1.51B and revenue of 7.39B, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.

DB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft reported a net income of 2.12B and revenue of 15.29B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NWG and DB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DB has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to NWG (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWG dropped -96.96% vs DB's -94.73%.

NWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWG and DB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer