PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVS vs. MKA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVS vs. MKA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novartis AG (NVS) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NVS is traded in USD, while MKA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MKA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVS achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than MKA.L's -10.47% return.


NVS

1D
-1.84%
1M
0.27%
YTD
9.43%
6M
15.91%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
10.33%

MKA.L

1D
2.49%
1M
-7.63%
YTD
-10.47%
6M
-15.90%
1Y
147.26%
3Y*
60.60%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVS vs. MKA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVS
Novartis AG
9.43%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
-10.47%529.04%-32.02%-1.17%-64.71%75.54%109.72%4.01%11.91%144.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NVS and MKA.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVS:

$280.54B

MKA.L:

£146.26M

EPS

NVS:

$6.99

MKA.L:

-£0.04

PS Ratio

NVS:

5.06

MKA.L:

2.72K

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVS:

$56.05B

MKA.L:

£50.78K

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVS:

$42.19B

MKA.L:

-£544.15K

EBITDA (TTM)

NVS:

$22.40B

MKA.L:

-£17.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVS vs. MKA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MKA.L
MKA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MKA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MKA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVS vs. MKA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NVS) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVSMKA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.84

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

5.91

-0.48

NVS vs. MKA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the MKA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVS and MKA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVSMKA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.54

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.07

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.27

+0.15

Drawdowns

NVS vs. MKA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVS drawdown since its inception was -42.10%, smaller than the maximum MKA.L drawdown of -89.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVS and MKA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVSMKA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.10%

-89.22%

+47.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-51.55%

+38.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-66.46%

+46.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.42%

-89.22%

+68.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.52%

-39.03%

+28.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.93%

-45.46%

+34.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

24.81%

-19.67%

Volatility

NVS vs. MKA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Novartis AG (NVS) is 6.16%, while Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) has a volatility of 22.35%. This indicates that NVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVSMKA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

22.35%

-16.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

48.60%

-34.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

95.35%

-74.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

77.87%

-59.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

96.62%

-77.00%

Dividends

NVS vs. MKA.L - Dividend Comparison

NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while MKA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVS
Novartis AG
3.26%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%

Financials

NVS vs. MKA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and Mkango Resources Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
13.52B
50.78K
(NVS) Total Revenue
(MKA.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NVS values in USD, MKA.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


NVS and MKA.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVS and MKA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer