NVDY vs. PG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, NVDY returned 53.70%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for PG. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

NVDY vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDY achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 2.74% return.

NVDY

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 6M: 11.29%
• 1Y: 42.27%
• 3Y*: 53.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PG

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: 6.43%
• 1Y: -8.99%
• 3Y*: 2.29%
• 5Y*: 4.10%
• 10Y*: 8.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDY vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	10.31%	27.38%	114.23%	41.31%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	2.74%	-12.26%	17.25%	-3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDY and PG is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	-0.18

Return for Risk

NVDY vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDY

NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 53
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 45
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 52

PG

PG Risk / Return Rank: 20
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDY vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDY	PG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	-0.48	+2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	-0.58	+2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.94	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	-0.58	+3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	-1.04	+9.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDY vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDY and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDY	PG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	-0.48	+2.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.46	+1.13

Drawdowns

NVDY vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDY drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDY and PG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDY	PG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.08%	-54.25%	+20.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-15.52%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.08%	-21.15%	-12.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.77%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.93%	-15.91%	+6.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-12.16%	+6.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.28%	8.93%	-3.65%

Volatility

NVDY vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.01%. This indicates that NVDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDY	PG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.13%	7.01%	+3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.34%	15.32%	+6.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.86%	18.65%	+9.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.29%	17.79%	+20.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.29%	19.05%	+19.24%

Dividends

NVDY vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

NVDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.50%, more than PG's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	64.50%	83.10%	83.65%	22.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	2.94%	2.91%	2.36%	2.55%	2.38%	2.08%	2.24%	2.37%	3.09%	2.98%	3.18%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDY and PG in my portfolio?

NVDY and PG have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDY or PG?

NVDY has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to PG (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDY dropped -34.08% vs PG's -54.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.