PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDX vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDX vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -23.22% return.


NVDX

1D
3.29%
1M
-8.23%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.02%
1Y
63.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTR

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-23.22%
6M
-24.81%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
108.67%
5Y*
41.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDX vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
10.05%26.24%384.03%28.06%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-23.22%135.03%340.48%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDX and PLTR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDX vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDX vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDXPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.07

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

0.18

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.29

0.33

+2.96

NVDX vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDX and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDXPLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.14

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.86

+0.51

Drawdowns

NVDX vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDXPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.19%

-84.62%

+16.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.76%

-38.19%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.35%

-34.13%

+10.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.28%

-40.29%

+20.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.42%

20.71%

-1.29%

Volatility

NVDX vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a higher volatility of 26.28% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 17.24%. This indicates that NVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDXPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.28%

17.24%

+9.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.61%

38.35%

+14.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.59%

50.93%

+18.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.73%

65.44%

+30.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.73%

69.81%

+25.92%

Dividends

NVDX vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
3.04%3.35%15.48%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDX and PLTR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDX has higher volatility (26.28%) compared to PLTR (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDX dropped -68.19% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDX and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer