PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDW vs. GLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDW vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -4.78% return.


NVDW

1D
1.74%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
12.02%
6M
12.57%
1Y
51.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDY

1D
0.29%
1M
-6.85%
YTD
-4.78%
6M
-2.80%
1Y
11.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDW vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and GLDY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDW vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDY
GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDW vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDWGLDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.74

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

1.98

+2.87

NVDW vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the GLDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDW and GLDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDWGLDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.57

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.42

+0.92

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and GLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDWGLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-15.57%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.54%

-15.57%

-9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.69%

-15.33%

+1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-4.02%

-4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.59%

5.83%

+4.76%

Volatility

NVDW vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.95%. This indicates that NVDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDWGLDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.23%

4.95%

+10.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.58%

18.57%

+13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.74%

20.14%

+21.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.59%

19.71%

+21.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.59%

19.71%

+21.88%

NVDW vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDW and GLDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

NVDW vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.31%, more than GLDY's 48.51% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDW and GLDY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDW has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to GLDY (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs GLDY's -15.57%.

On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 51.10% vs 11.50% for GLDY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 51.10% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDW and GLDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.31%, compared with 48.51% for GLDY.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance.

NVDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDW and GLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer