NVDW vs. GLDY
NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDW returned 51.10% vs 11.50% for GLDY. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
NVDW vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -4.78% return.
NVDW
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 51.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 6M
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- 11.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 12.02% | 33.44% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -4.78% | 17.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDW and GLDY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDW vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank
NVDW
GLDY
NVDW vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDW | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 0.74 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 1.98 | +2.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDW | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.57 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.42 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
NVDW vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and GLDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDW | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -15.57% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -15.57% | -9.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.69% | -15.33% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -4.02% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.59% | 5.83% | +4.76% |
Volatility
NVDW vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.95%. This indicates that NVDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDW | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.23% | 4.95% | +10.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.58% | 18.57% | +13.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.74% | 20.14% | +21.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.59% | 19.71% | +21.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.59% | 19.71% | +21.88% |
NVDW vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NVDW and GLDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
NVDW vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison
NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.31%, more than GLDY's 48.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 48.51% | 37.38% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 61.31% | 38.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDW and GLDY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDW has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to GLDY (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs GLDY's -15.57%.
On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 51.10% vs 11.50% for GLDY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 51.10% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDW and GLDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.31%, compared with 48.51% for GLDY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance.
NVDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDW and GLDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer