PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDA vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 68.47%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.80% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
1.73%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.58%
1Y
47.43%
3Y*
75.35%
5Y*
64.54%
10Y*
68.47%

VOOG

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
10.10%
6M
9.55%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
12.01%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.10%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and VOOG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.67

The correlation between NVDA and VOOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDAVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.13

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

8.74

-3.01

NVDA vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDAVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.79

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

0.72

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

0.86

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.89

-0.27

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-32.73%

-56.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-13.71%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-22.18%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-32.73%

-33.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-32.73%

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.39%

-4.28%

-7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-4.97%

-31.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

3.33%

+4.97%

Volatility

NVDA vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 5.61%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.14%

5.61%

+7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.37%

13.04%

+13.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.81%

16.31%

+18.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.75%

21.25%

+30.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.85%

20.77%

+29.08%

Dividends

NVDA vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than VOOG's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and VOOG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to VOOG (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer