NVDA vs. SVARX
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while SVARX (Spectrum Low Volatility Fund) is Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 68.47%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for SVARX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVDA vs. SVARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than SVARX's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed SVARX with an annualized return of 68.47%, while SVARX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.
NVDA
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 47.43%
- 3Y*
- 75.35%
- 5Y*
- 64.54%
- 10Y*
- 68.47%
SVARX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 5.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
NVDA vs. SVARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 12.01% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
SVARX Spectrum Low Volatility Fund | 1.10% | 6.22% | 2.60% | 9.67% | -4.35% | 4.10% | 19.50% | 9.42% | -0.99% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA and SVARX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2013 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA vs. SVARX — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA
SVARX
NVDA vs. SVARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDA | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.44 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.22 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 5.20 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDA | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.09 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 1.03 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.38 | 1.63 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.69 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
NVDA vs. SVARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than SVARX's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and SVARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.72% | -6.48% | -83.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -2.55% | -17.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.88% | -2.55% | -34.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.34% | -6.48% | -59.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.34% | -6.48% | -59.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.39% | -1.69% | -9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.20% | -1.22% | -34.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.30% | 1.09% | +7.21% |
Volatility
NVDA vs. SVARX - Volatility Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) at 0.79%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.14% | 0.79% | +12.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.37% | 2.21% | +24.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.81% | 2.71% | +32.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.75% | 3.10% | +48.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.85% | 3.68% | +46.17% |
Dividends
NVDA vs. SVARX - Dividend Comparison
NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SVARX's 5.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
SVARX Spectrum Low Volatility Fund | 5.88% | 5.95% | 9.35% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 5.85% | 0.71% | 4.91% | 2.41% | 6.90% | 9.07% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA and SVARX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to SVARX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs SVARX's -6.48%.
SVARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDA and SVARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer